The importance of choosing a proper validation strategy in predictive models. A tutorial with real examples
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Eneko Lopez1, Jaione Etxebarria-Elezgarai2, Jose Manuel Amigo3
1CIC NanoGUNE BRTA, Tolosa Hiribidea 76, San Sebastián, 20018, Spain; Department of Physics, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), San Sebastián, 20018, Spain.
Abstract:
Machine learning is the art of combining a set of measurement data and predictive variables to forecast future events. Every day, new model approaches (with high levels of sophistication) can be found in the literature. However, less importance is given to the crucial stage of validation. Validation is the assessment that the model reliably links the measurements and the predictive variables. Nevertheless, there are many ways in which a model can be validated and cross-validated reliably, but still, it may be a model that wrongly reflects the real nature of the data and cannot be used to predict external samples. This manuscript shows in a didactical manner how important the data structure is when a model is constructed and how easy it is to obtain models that look promising with wrong-designed cross-validation and external validation strategies. A comprehensive overview of the main validation strategies is shown, exemplified by three different scenarios, all of them focused on classification.
More Related Videos
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Reliability and Validity
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...