Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Introduction01:13

Gas Chromatography: Introduction

2.1K
Gas chromatography (GC) is a technique for separating and analyzing volatile compounds in a sample. Its primary purpose is to identify and quantify components in complex mixtures, making it essential in fields such as environmental analysis, pharmaceuticals, and petrochemicals. GC is also called vapor-phase chromatography (VPC) or gas-liquid partition chromatography (GLPC).
In GC,  a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a...
2.1K
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)01:14

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

4.4K
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is the combination of analytical techniques of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in a single instrument for analyzing a mixture of compounds. The gas chromatograph separates the compounds in the mixture, and the mass spectrometer analyzes each compound separately to determine the molecular masses and molecular structures.
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
4.4K
Gas Chromatography: Sample Injection Systems01:08

Gas Chromatography: Sample Injection Systems

453
In gas chromatography, the sample is introduced as a vapor plug into the carrier gas stream for high efficiency and resolution. A microsyringe injects the sample solution into a heated sample port, vaporizing it and mixing it with the carrier gas. This process is important to ensure the sample is properly prepared for analysis. Thermally sensitive samples can be injected directly into the column and volatilized by slowly increasing the column temperature.
Two primary injection methods are used...
453
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

619
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
619
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

478
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
478
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases01:17

Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases

724
Gas chromatography (GC) relies on stationary phases to separate and analyze components in a sample. There are two main types of stationary phases: liquid and solid. Liquid stationary phases are non-volatile, thermally stable, and chemically inert liquids coated onto the column. Solid stationary phases are particles of adsorbent material, such as silica gel or molecular sieves.
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
724

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterization of key aroma-active terpenes in Brazilian seasonings using eco-friendly DI-SPME with GC×GC-MS and odor activity value workflow.

NPJ science of food·2026
Same author

Green microextraction and GC × GC/MS quantification of PAHs and derivatives in roasted/smoked spices and dry herbs: implications for food safety.

Food chemistry·2025
Same author

Assessing PAH contamination in Brazilian urban soils: Eco-friendly microextraction for source identification and risk evaluation.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2025
Same author

Analysis of contaminants in surface water after the collapse of the Córrego do Feijão mine dam in Brumadinho, Brazil.

The Science of the total environment·2025
Same author

A Comprehensive Review of the Harmful Compounds in Electronic Cigarettes.

Toxics·2025
Same author

Robust DEEP heterogeneous ensemble and META-learning for honey authentication.

Food chemistry·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
10:14

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

Published on: September 2, 2020

5.0K

A deep learning-based simulator for comprehensive two-dimensional GC applications.

Lucas Almir Cavalcante Minho1, Zenilda de Lourdes Cardeal1, Helvécio Costa Menezes1

  • 1Departamento de Química, ICEx, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Journal of Separation Science
|July 31, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Deep learning models accurately predict retention times in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography, enabling method optimization and simulation. A collaborative database is proposed for improved prediction of less common compounds.

Keywords:
artificial intelligencecollaboratory sciencedata sciencemachine learningpublic database

More Related Videos

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
11:44

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 6, 2016

9.4K
On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
07:49

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes

Published on: August 5, 2016

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
10:14

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

Published on: September 2, 2020

5.0K
Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
11:44

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 6, 2016

9.4K
On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
07:49

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes

Published on: August 5, 2016

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Computational Chemistry

Background:

  • Predicting eluate positions in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) is crucial for method optimization.
  • Deep learning (DL) models offer robust and adaptable solutions for complex chromatographic data analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an open-source deep neural network (DNN) program for optimizing GC×GC methods.
  • To enable simulation of operating conditions and prediction of retention times outside the laboratory.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a DNN-based program utilizing experimental predictors.
  • Training and validation of DL models for predicting first- and second-dimension retention times.

Main Results:

  • Achieved scaled losses (MSE) of 0.006 and 0.014 for first and second dimension retention time predictions, respectively.
  • Demonstrated good prediction accuracy (R² > 0.8) for diverse chemical classes including environmental contaminants, biomolecules, and pharmaceuticals.
  • Identified the need for continuous database updates for accurate prediction of less common compounds.

Conclusions:

  • DNN models provide a reliable approach for retention time prediction in GC×GC.
  • The developed open-source program facilitates method optimization and simulation.
  • A collaborative database is proposed to enhance predictive capabilities for a wider range of compounds.