Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Alternative partial respiratory disability rating schemes.

P Harber

    The American Review of Respiratory Disease
    |September 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Is postal postoperative follow-up in urogynaecology feasible?

    Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2012
    Same author

    Longitudinal analyses of chest radiographs from the European Carbon Black Respiratory Morbidity Study.

    The European respiratory journal·2002
    Same author

    Frequency of occupational health concerns in general clinics.

    Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2001
    Same author

    Time and knowledge barriers to recognizing occupational disease.

    Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2001
    Same author

    Intelligent database generated occupational questionnaire system.

    Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2000
    Same author

    Hypersensitivity pneumonitis from Pezizia domiciliana. A case of El Niño lung.

    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·1999
    Same journal

    Human lung lysozyme: sources and properties.

    The American review of respiratory disease·2015
    Same journal

    "Immotile-cilia" syndrome and ciliary abnormalities induced by infection and injury.

    The American review of respiratory disease·2013
    Same journal

    Adult criteria for obstructive apnea do not identify children with serious obstruction.

    The American review of respiratory disease·1993
    Same journal

    Cell adhesion molecules and the bronchial epithelium.

    The American review of respiratory disease·1993
    Same journal

    Adhesion molecules and cytokine production.

    The American review of respiratory disease·1993
    Same journal

    Molecular mechanisms mediating lymphocyte recirculation, inflammation, and metastasis formation.

    The American review of respiratory disease·1993
    See all related articles

    Standardizing disability ratings for respiratory impairment is crucial. This study compared 12 methods for assessing partial respiratory disability in asbestos lung disease claimants, revealing significant differences in outcomes.

    Area of Science:

    • Occupational Medicine
    • Pulmonary Medicine
    • Disability Assessment

    Background:

    • Lack of a standardized method for rating partial respiratory disability.
    • Clinical physiologic testing is used, but rating schemes vary.
    • Asbestos lung disease compensation claims require accurate disability assessment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare 12 alternative schemes for rating partial respiratory disability.
    • To evaluate the impact of different rating schemes on compensation claimants.
    • To identify variations in disability ratings based on chosen methodologies.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparison of 12 distinct disability rating schemes.
    • Analysis of clinical physiologic testing results.
    • Application of schemes to 650 asbestos lung disease compensation claimants.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Significant differences in disability ratings were observed between schemes.
    • Average disability ratings ranged widely from 17% to 57%.
    • Scheme performance varied based on the degree and pattern of physiologic impairment.

    Conclusions:

    • No single standardized method currently exists for rating partial respiratory disability.
    • The choice of rating scheme significantly impacts disability assessment outcomes.
    • Further research is needed to develop and validate standardized methods for respiratory disability evaluation.