Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Scaled-Up Preparation of an Intermediate of Upatinib, ACT051-3
Published on: April 7, 2023
Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors: A Real-World Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Marco Lanzillotta1, Nicola Boffini2, Elisa Barone3
1M. Lanzillotta, MD, Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy, and Rare diseases (UnIRAR), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University.
Objective:
Oral Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) represent an effective strategy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. A previous study supported that tofacitinib (TOF) is associated with higher incidence of cardiovascular (CV) and neoplastic events compared to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Given the apparent discrepancy between these data and real-world experience, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the available JAKis in a multicenter cohort.
Methods:
We retrospectively evaluated patients with RA who ever received 1 JAKi (TOF, baricitinib [BAR], upadactinib [UPA], filgotinib [FIL]) from 4 tertiary care centers in Milan, Italy. Outcomes related to JAKi safety were recorded, particularly major CV events as well as adverse events of special interest (AESIs), which included serious infections, opportunistic infections, venous thromboembolism, herpes zoster infections, liver injury, malignancies, and deaths; retention rates were also calculated. Further analyses included patients fulfilling the risk factors suggested to influence TOF safety.
Results:
Six hundred eighty-five patients were included and received BAR (48%), TOF (31%), UPA (14%), or FIL (7%) as first-line innovative treatment prior to a biologic. Of a total of 1137 patient-years of observation, we recorded 1 stroke and 123 (18%) AESIs, including 3 deaths, all a result of severe infections. Among patients with a higher CV risk, we observed a higher frequency of AESIs (23%).
Conclusion:
Our real-world data confirm that JAKis are effective and carry a low risk of AESIs, especially in patients who do not display CV risk factors at baseline. Our study could not identify differences between JAKis. Different safety profiles should be defined in larger prospective cohorts.
Insights
Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are effective for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Real-world data show JAKis have a low risk of adverse events, particularly in patients without cardiovascular risk factors.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Oral Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are a key treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
- Previous studies suggested tofacitinib (TOF) may increase cardiovascular (CV) and neoplastic risks compared to TNF inhibitors.
- Real-world data are needed to clarify the safety and efficacy of various JAKis in RA management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the safety and efficacy of available JAKis (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadactinib, filgotinib) in a multicenter RA cohort.
- To compare real-world outcomes with previous findings on JAKi safety.
- To analyze safety events, particularly cardiovascular events and adverse events of special interest (AESIs), in relation to patient risk factors.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective evaluation of 685 RA patients treated with one JAKi (baricitinib, tofacitinib, upadactinib, or filgotinib) across 4 Italian tertiary care centers.
- Recording of safety outcomes, including major CV events, AESIs (serious infections, opportunistic infections, VTE, herpes zoster, liver injury, malignancies, deaths), and treatment retention rates.
- Analysis of AESI frequency in patients with risk factors associated with tofacitinib safety.
Main Results:
- Baricitinib was the most common JAKi (48%), followed by tofacitinib (31%), upadactinib (14%), and filgotinib (7%).
- Over 1137 patient-years, 1 stroke and 123 (18%) AESIs were recorded, including 3 deaths primarily from severe infections.
- Patients with higher CV risk exhibited a greater frequency of AESIs (23%).
Conclusions:
- Real-world data indicate JAKis are effective for RA with a low risk of AESIs, especially in patients without baseline CV risk factors.
- No significant differences in safety profiles were identified among the studied JAKis in this cohort.
- Larger prospective studies are recommended to further define the distinct safety profiles of individual JAKis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

