Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

05:05
Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration
Published on: November 23, 2019
8.0K
Arithmetic hip knee angle measurement on long leg radiograph versus computed tomography-inter-observer and
Tom Jan Gieroba1,2,3,4, Sofia Marasco5, Sina Babazadeh5,6,7
1Department of Orthopaedics, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia. tom.gieroba@adelaide.edu.au.
Arthroplasty (London, England)
|August 1, 2023
Summary
Computed tomography (CT) measurements for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment, including the arithmetic Hip Knee Angle (aHKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), demonstrate superior reproducibility compared to long leg radiographs (LLR). CT may replace LLR for pre-operative knee alignment assessment.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Radiology
- Biomedical engineering
Background:
- Accurate pre-operative coronal alignment is crucial for total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
- The arithmetic Hip Knee Angle (aHKA) measures coronal alignment using medial proximal tibial (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angles (LDFA).
- Traditionally, aHKA is measured using long leg radiographs (LLR), with potential limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the reproducibility of aHKA measurements on LLR versus CT scans.
- To compare intra-observer and inter-observer reliability for these measurements across modalities.
- To evaluate CT as a potential alternative to LLR for pre-operative knee alignment assessment.
Main Methods:
- Sixty-eight TKA patients with pre-operative LLR and planning CT scans were analyzed.
- Three observers repeatedly measured MPTA, LDFA, and aHKA on both LLR and CT data.
- Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability were calculated using Pearson's r and Bland-Altman analysis.
Main Results:
- CT measurements showed higher intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility (lower Coefficient of Repeatability) for MPTA, LDFA, and aHKA compared to LLR.
- Pearson's r values indicated strong correlation (0.90-0.97) between LLR and CT measurements for all parameters.
- CT measurements demonstrated superior reliability, particularly for MPTA (intra-observer COR 1.73° vs. 3.50°, inter-observer COR 1.28° vs. 2.74°).
Conclusions:
- CT measurements of MPTA, LDFA, and aHKA are more reproducible and correlate well with LLR measurements.
- CT overcomes limitations associated with LLRs, such as patient positioning, rotation, habitus, and contractures.
- Pre-operative CT may obviate the need for LLRs in assessing coronal plane alignment for TKA.

