Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is Natural Selection?01:32

What is Natural Selection?

115.6K
Natural selection is an evolutionary process in which individuals with survival-promoting traits reproduce at higher rates. These favorable traits become more common within a population or species. Naturally selected traits initially arise via random genetic mutations. In order for selection to occur, there must be variation within a population, the trait controlling the variation must be heritable, and there must be an evolutionary advantage for variation in the trait.
115.6K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

40.6K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.6K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

22.1K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.1K
Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

39.9K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
39.9K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

31.4K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
31.4K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

58.5K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
58.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using Modern Coexistence Theory to Understand Community Disassembly.

Ecology letters·2026
Same author

Population size in stochastic multi-patch ecological models.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
Same author

DYNAMICS OF STOCHASTIC MICROORGANISM FLOCCULATION MODELS.

ArXiv·2025
Same author

A practical guide to characterising ecological coexistence.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2025
Same author

Coexistence and extinction in flow-kick systems: An invasion growth rate approach.

Journal of mathematical biology·2025
Same author

Population size in stochastic discrete-time ecological dynamics.

Journal of mathematical biology·2025
Same journal

Traffic Reduction during COVID-19 Lockdowns Benefited Species Already Tolerant of Noise Pollution: An Acoustic Analysis.

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

On Pachycephalosaurs, Trade-Offs, and the Historical Genesis of Sociosexual Display Structures.

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

Structured Landscapes Promote Persistence by Favoring Prudent Predators.

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

Can Carbon Economy Explain Leaf Dynamic Seasonality in a Tropical Seasonal Rainforest?

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

Behavior and Physiology Outpace Form When Linking Traits to Ecological Responses within Populations: A Meta-Analysis.

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

Seminal Fluid Proteins as Regulation Factors for Optimizing Reproduction: A Modeling Approach.

The American naturalist·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.0K

Coevolution of Patch Selection in Stochastic Environments.

Sebastian J Schreiber, Alexandru Hening, Dang H Nguyen

    The American Naturalist
    |August 2, 2023
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Environmental variability shapes species interactions and habitat selection. Coevolutionarily stable strategies (coESSs) reveal how species balance growth and risk, leading to bet-hedging strategies in changing landscapes.

    Keywords:
    coevolutionenvironmental stochasticityevolutionarily stable strategyhabitat selectionportfolio theory

    More Related Videos

    Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
    08:16

    Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

    Published on: March 13, 2014

    18.9K
    Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments
    09:03

    Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

    Published on: May 21, 2019

    9.6K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 20, 2025

    Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
    04:52

    Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

    Published on: February 3, 2023

    1.0K
    Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
    08:16

    Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

    Published on: March 13, 2014

    18.9K
    Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments
    09:03

    Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

    Published on: May 21, 2019

    9.6K

    Area of Science:

    • Ecology
    • Evolutionary Biology
    • Theoretical Ecology

    Background:

    • Species inhabit dynamic landscapes with varying environmental conditions.
    • Ideal free distributions explain some habitat selection but not all observed patterns, such as occupying sink patches or predator avoidance of productive areas.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate coevolutionarily stable strategies (coESSs) for patch selection in multispecies systems.
    • To understand how spatial and temporal environmental heterogeneity influences species interactions and distributions.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed and solved multispecies stochastic Lotka-Volterra models.
    • Analyzed coevolutionarily stable strategies (coESSs) for patch selection under environmental heterogeneity.
    • Applied principles from modern portfolio theory to interpret results.

    Main Results:

    • At coESS, differences in local contributions to population growth rate mean and variance are equalized across occupied patches.
    • Environmental stochasticity can lead to novel enemy-free/victimless spaces and generate hydra effects.
    • CoESS often involves bet-hedging strategies, including the use of stochastic sink populations.

    Conclusions:

    • Environmental stochasticity significantly alters evolutionary outcomes of species interactions and spatial distributions.
    • CoESS provides a framework to explain complex ecological patterns not captured by simpler models.
    • Understanding these dynamics is crucial for predicting species persistence in heterogeneous and changing environments.