Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

07:52
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
Published on: October 5, 2020
3.6K
Mild cognitive impairment identification based on motor and cognitive dual-task pooled indices
Gianmaria Mancioppi1, Erika Rovini1,2, Laura Fiorini1,2
1The Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Plos One
|August 2, 2023
Summary
Motor and cognitive dual-task (MCDT) approaches effectively identify mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and subjective cognitive impairment (SCI). Combining motor performance indices with clinical scores significantly improves diagnostic accuracy for these conditions.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Gerontology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) are precursors to dementia.
- Early identification is crucial for timely intervention and management.
- Current diagnostic methods can be limited in sensitivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of motor and cognitive dual-task (MCDT) approaches in differentiating between cognitively normal adults (CNA), individuals with SCI, and those with MCI.
- To assess the contribution of motor performance indices (PIs) derived from MCDTs, demographic data (age), and clinical scores (Frontal Assessment Battery - FAB) in diagnostic models.
Main Methods:
- 44 older adults underwent assessments using the SensHand and SensFoot wearable systems during three MCDTs: forefinger tapping (FTAP), toe-tapping heel pin (TTHP), and 10 m walking (GAIT).
- Five pooled indices (PIs) were developed from MCDT data.
- Logistic regression models were constructed incorporating PIs, age, and FAB scores to classify participants into CNA, SCI, or MCI groups.
Main Results:
- Models distinguishing between CNA and MCI achieved accuracies of 67-78% with PIs and age alone, increasing to 85-89% with the addition of clinical scores.
- For classifying CNA, SCI, and MCI, models using PIs and age yielded 50-59% accuracy, which improved by 18% when FAB scores were included.
- The TTHP PI demonstrated particularly high performance in differentiating among the three groups.
Conclusions:
- MCDT-derived PIs combined with age are effective for distinguishing between CNA and MCI.
- Incorporating clinical scores significantly enhances the accuracy of these diagnostic models.
- The TTHP PI shows promise for differentiating between CNA, SCI, and MCI, suggesting MCDTs offer valuable tools for clinical assessment.

