Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Feedback control systems01:26

Feedback control systems

346
Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
346
Open and closed-loop control systems01:17

Open and closed-loop control systems

813
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
813
Effects of feedback01:24

Effects of feedback

603
Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
603
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:07

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

141
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
141
Control Systems01:10

Control Systems

1.2K
Control systems are everywhere in contemporary society, influencing diverse applications from aerospace to automated manufacturing. These systems can be found naturally within biological processes, such as blood sugar regulation and heart rate adjustment in response to stress, as well as in man-made systems like elevators and automated vehicles. A control system is essentially a network of subsystems and processes that collaboratively convert specific inputs into desired outputs.
At the heart...
1.2K
Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:24

Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

142
Proportional-Derivative (PD) controllers are widely used in fan control systems to improve stability and performance. A fan control system can be effectively represented using a Bode plot to illustrate the impact of a PD controller through its transfer function. The Bode plot visually conveys how PD control modifies the fan's response across various frequencies, providing a frequency domain interpretation of the controller's behavior.
The proportional control gain, combined with the...
142

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative analysis of measurement systems and methods for force and velocity determinations in loaded and unloaded vertical jumps.

Sports biomechanics·2025
Same author

Frankenstein matrices: Among-population life history variation affects the reliability and predictions of demographic models.

The Journal of animal ecology·2025
Same author

Multibody system dynamics for bio-robotic design and simulation based on inching-locomotion caterpillar's gait: MBD-ILAR method.

Bioinspiration & biomimetics·2024
Same author

Reducing cost of transport in asymmetrical gaits: lessons from unilateral skipping.

European journal of applied physiology·2022
Same author

Compensatory recruitment allows amphibian population persistence in anthropogenic habitats.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2025

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
07:28

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

7.3K

Effectiveness of a Variable-Speed Control Based on Auditory Feedback: Is It Possible?

Leonardo Lagos-Hausheer1,2, Renata L Bona1, Carlo M Biancardi1

  • 1Biomechanics and Movement Analysis Research Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Paysandú,Uruguay.

International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
|August 2, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Controlling variable speed in field tests is difficult. Using the same step frequency on a track resulted in higher speeds than in a laboratory, highlighting the need for reliable speed control in open-field testing.

Keywords:
locomotionoxygen consumptionrunningtransition speedwalking

More Related Videos

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces
10:51

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

13.8K
A Lightweight, Headphones-based System for Manipulating Auditory Feedback in Songbirds
10:13

A Lightweight, Headphones-based System for Manipulating Auditory Feedback in Songbirds

Published on: November 26, 2012

14.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2025

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
07:28

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

7.3K
An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces
10:51

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

13.8K
A Lightweight, Headphones-based System for Manipulating Auditory Feedback in Songbirds
10:13

A Lightweight, Headphones-based System for Manipulating Auditory Feedback in Songbirds

Published on: November 26, 2012

14.4K

Area of Science:

  • Exercise physiology
  • Biomechanics
  • Locomotion science

Background:

  • Variable-speed control presents challenges in motion science research.
  • Standardizing locomotion parameters like step frequency across different environments (laboratory vs. field) is crucial for data comparability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of auditory feedback for controlling variable speeds during treadmill and track tests.
  • To assess variations in speed, Froude number, and oxygen consumption at a consistent step frequency across laboratory and track settings.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-four trained male participants completed 50-second acceleration ramps at varying percentages of their walking-running transition speed.
  • Step frequency was recorded using a mobile phone during treadmill tests and replicated on a track with auditory feedback.

Main Results:

  • Average speed on the track was consistently higher (54.7%) than in the laboratory for the same step frequency (P < .050).
  • While track speeds were higher, the difference in oxygen consumption between track and laboratory was not statistically significant (P > .050).

Conclusions:

  • Maintaining the same step frequency does not equate to the same running speed in laboratory versus track environments.
  • Accurate and reliable speed control is essential for valid results in open-field locomotion studies.