Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Oncogenic Gene Fusion Detection Using Anchored Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Followed by Next Generation Sequencing
Published on: July 5, 2019
RNA Sequencing for Solid Tumor Fusion Gene Detection: Proficiency Testing Practice and Performance Comparison
Julia A Bridge1,2, Kevin C Halling3, Joel T Moncur4
1From the Division of Cytogenetic and Molecular Pathology, ProPath, Dallas, Texas (Bridge).
Clinical laboratories show high accuracy in detecting fusion genes using RNA sequencing. However, challenges remain in identifying intragenic rearrangements and exon-skipping events, with false negatives occurring more frequently for these complex alterations.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Genomic Medicine
- Clinical Pathology
Background:
- RNA sequencing is vital for detecting genetic alterations like fusion genes in clinical labs.
- The College of American Pathologists (CAP) provides proficiency testing (PT) for RNA sequencing assays.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate laboratory performance in RNA sequencing for detecting fusion genes, intragenic rearrangements, and exon-skipping events.
- Analyze CAP PT data from 2018-A to 2021-B to assess assay accuracy and laboratory practices.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of results from 153 laboratories participating in the CAP RNA sequencing PT program.
- Evaluation of 24 PT specimens with 22 distinct engineered fusion transcripts.
- Assessment of correct fusion event identification, performance variables, and laboratory practices.
Main Results:
- Overall sensitivity for fusion gene detection was 95.5%.
- False-negative rates were 3.6% for fusion genes and 18.3% for intragenic rearrangements/exon-skipping events.
- Few false positives were reported, likely due to pre/postanalytical errors; no practice characteristics correlated with detection results.
Conclusions:
- Clinical RNA sequencing demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for fusion gene detection.
- Laboratory performance was consistent across different methodologies.
- Intragenic rearrangement and exon-skipping event detection showed higher false-negative rates compared to fusion genes.
More Related Videos
13:24Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
11:15Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
Published on: September 20, 2016