Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Establishment of a Primary Culture of Patient-derived Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Published on: April 11, 2018
What is a useful marker for predicting survival in patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcoma who have
Tomoki Nakamura1, Kunihiro Asanuma1, Tomohito Hagi1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Background:
The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) is a reliable system for identifying patients at high risk of death among patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The scoring systems use a combination of C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin levels. Although patients with high-grade STS are at risk of metastasis and death, even if their mGPS is 0, the prognostic indicators in these patients are unknown. Therefore, we investigated useful prognostic indicators for survival and the development of metastasis in patients with high-grade STS and an mGPS of 0.
Methods:
One hundred and four patients with CRP and albumin levels of <1.0 mg/dl and >3.5 g/dl, respectively, indicating an mGPS of 0, were included. The mean follow-up period was 79 months.
Results:
The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 79.2%. Cox proportional analysis showed that tumor size and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) were prognostic variables in multivariate analyses. Patients with higher ANC (ANC>3370/μl) had a worse DSS than those with lower ANC. The 5-year DSS was 74.7% vs. 91.7%, respectively (p = 0.0207). The 5-year metastasis-free survival was 67.2%. Tumor size and ANC remained significant variables for predicting the development of metastasis in the multivariate analysis. Patients with higher ANC had a worse metastasis-free survival than those with lower ANC. The 5-year metastasis-free survival was 59.5% vs. 87.3%, respectively (p = 0.00269).
Conclusions:
When patients with high-grade STS have an mGPS of 0, the ANC and tumor size should be carefully evaluated. A higher neutrophil count and larger tumor size may increase the risk of metastasis development.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis

