Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
Colistin Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms
Keith S Kaye1, Dror Marchaim2, Visanu Thamlikitkul3
1Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Background:
Pneumonia and bloodstream infections (BSI) due to extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii, XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are associated with high mortality rates, and therapeutic options remain limited. This trial assessed whether combination therapy with colistin and meropenem was superior to colistin monotherapy for the treatment of these infections.
Methods:
The OVERCOME (Colistin Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy) trial was an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We randomly assigned participants to receive colistin (5 mg/kg once followed by 1.67 mg/kg every 8 hours) in combination with either meropenem (1000 mg every 8 hours) or matching placebo for the treatment of pneumonia and/or BSI caused by XDR A. baumannii, XDR P. aeruginosa, or CRE. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and secondary outcomes included clinical failure and microbiologic cure.
Results:
Between 2012 and 2020, a total of 464 participants were randomly assigned to treatment, and 423 eligible patients comprised the modified intention-to-treat population. A. baumannii was the predominant trial pathogen (78%) and pneumonia the most common index infection (70%). Most patients were in the intensive care unit at the time of enrollment (69%). There was no difference in mortality (43 vs. 37%; P=0.17), clinical failure (65 vs. 58%; difference, 6.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.1 to 16.6), microbiologic cure (65 vs. 60%; difference, 4.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.6 to 15.2), or adverse events (acute kidney injury, 52 vs. 49% [P=0.55]; hypersensitivity reaction, 1 vs. 3% [P=0.22]; and neurotoxicity, 5 vs. 2% [P=0.29]) between patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively.
Conclusions:
Combination therapy with colistin and meropenem was not superior to colistin monotherapy for the treatment of pneumonia or BSI caused by these pathogens. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases protocol 10-0065; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01597973.).
Insights
Combination therapy with colistin and meropenem did not improve outcomes for patients with pneumonia or bloodstream infections caused by extensively drug-resistant bacteria. Colistin monotherapy showed similar efficacy and safety compared to the combination treatment.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Microbiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria like Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) cause severe pneumonia and bloodstream infections (BSI).
- Limited therapeutic options and high mortality rates underscore the need for effective treatments against these multidrug-resistant pathogens.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy (colistin plus meropenem) versus colistin monotherapy for treating XDR bacterial infections.
- To compare 28-day mortality, clinical failure, and microbiologic cure rates between the two treatment arms.
Main Methods:
- An international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (OVERCOME) involving 464 participants.
- Participants received either colistin with meropenem or colistin with placebo for pneumonia and/or BSI caused by XDR A. baumannii, XDR P. aeruginosa, or CRE.
- Primary outcome was 28-day mortality; secondary outcomes included clinical failure and microbiologic cure.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in 28-day mortality between combination therapy (43%) and colistin monotherapy (37%; P=0.17).
- Clinical failure rates (65% vs. 58%) and microbiologic cure rates (65% vs. 60%) were also similar between groups.
- Adverse events, including acute kidney injury, hypersensitivity reactions, and neurotoxicity, did not differ significantly between the monotherapy and combination therapy groups.
Conclusions:
- Combination therapy with colistin and meropenem is not superior to colistin monotherapy for treating pneumonia or BSI caused by XDR A. baumannii, XDR P. aeruginosa, or CRE.
- Colistin monotherapy offers comparable efficacy and safety, suggesting it as a viable treatment option for these challenging infections.
More Related Videos
11:15Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations
Published on: July 24, 2021
09:26Antibiotic Efficacy Testing in an Ex vivo Model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in the Cystic Fibrosis Lung
Published on: January 22, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
Antibiotic Selection
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy