Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.6K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.6K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.5K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.0K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.0K
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.1K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.1K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

2.9K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.9K
Convenience Sampling Method00:55

Convenience Sampling Method

9.0K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
9.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Traditional Chinese medicine-based visual assessment of tongue features associated with current cancer vs. no cancer history: a matched case-control study.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Exploring traditional Chinese medicine tongue diagnosis in potential cancer identification: A scoping review.

Integrative medicine research·2026
Same author

Validation of a Qigong quality of life questionnaire (3Q instrument) in patients with cancer: a study protocol.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

A pilot investigation of muscle conditioning as a tool to study neck proprioception and vestibular reweighting during head to trunk movement.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Adrenal Ganglioneuroma Masquerading as a Suspicious Adrenal Incidentaloma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Advancements of artificial intelligence algorithms in predicting dental implant prognosis from radiographic images: A systematic review.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.6K

Discrete choice experiments: An overview on constructing D-optimal and near-optimal choice sets.

Abdulrahman S Alamri1,2, Stelios Georgiou1, Stella Stylianou1

  • 1School of Science, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.

Heliyon
|August 4, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study compares discrete choice experiment (DCE) design methods to minimize choice sets for efficient surveys. Findings guide researchers on optimal sample sizes for effective experimental design.

Keywords:
Efficient designsMultinomial logit modelOptimal designsOrthogonal main effect plansStated choice

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.7K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.6K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.7K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Experimental Design
  • Survey Methodology

Background:

  • Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are vital for estimating and forecasting individual choice behavior using stated preference data.
  • Effective DCEs rely on well-constructed experimental designs, often involving a limited number of choice sets and alternatives per set to enhance response efficiency.
  • While algorithmic (efficient) designs are common, optimal (orthogonal) designs are still used, especially when prior population preference information is unavailable.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of discrete choice experiment construction methods in the literature for models focusing solely on main effects.
  • To compare various optimal and near-optimal design construction techniques based on their efficiency in minimizing the number of choice sets.
  • To address practitioner concerns regarding the performance of different design techniques in achieving high efficiency with minimal choice sets.

Main Methods:

  • A literature review was conducted to identify and categorize different construction approaches for discrete choice experiment designs.
  • Comparative analysis of various optimal and near-optimal design construction methods was performed.
  • The primary metric for comparison was the ability of each method to minimize the number of choice sets required for a survey.

Main Results:

  • The study reviewed and compared different techniques for constructing discrete choice experiment designs, focusing on models with main effects only.
  • The comparison evaluated the effectiveness of various construction methods in reducing the number of choice sets while maintaining high design efficiency.
  • Key findings highlight the trade-offs between different design strategies concerning the number of choice sets and overall experimental efficiency.

Conclusions:

  • The research offers insights into the performance of various discrete choice experiment design construction methods.
  • Findings illuminate the optimal sample sizes necessary for conducting efficient experiments in this domain.
  • This work aims to assist researchers in designing more effective discrete choice experiments by understanding the strengths of different design approaches.