Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...

IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations

IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations

Identical bonds within a polyatomic group can stretch symmetrically (in-phase) or asymmetrically (out-of-phase). Similar to hydrogen bonding, these vibrations also influence the shape of the IR peak. Generally, asymmetric stretching frequencies are higher than symmetric stretching frequencies. For example, primary amines exhibit two distinct IR peaks between 3300–3500 cm−1 corresponding to the symmetric and asymmetric N-H stretching, while secondary amines exhibit a single...

Perception of Sound Waves

Perception of Sound Waves

The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...

Aliasing

Aliasing

Accurate signal sampling and reconstruction are crucial in various signal-processing applications. A time-domain signal's spectrum can be revealed using its Fourier transform. When this signal is sampled at a specific frequency, it results in multiple scaled replicas of the original spectrum in the frequency domain. The spacing of these replicas is determined by the sampling frequency.
If the sampling frequency is below the Nyquist rate, these replicas overlap, preventing the original...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Synchronizing Automatic Gain Control in Bilateral Cochlear Implants Mitigates Dynamic Localization Deficits Introduced by Independent Bilateral Compression.

Ear and hearing·2024

Same author

Cones-of-Confusions: Are listeners confused? (L).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023

Same author

Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2022

Same author

Spatial Release from Masking for Tones and Noises in a Soundfield under Conditions Where Targets and Maskers Are Stationary or Moving.

Audiology research·2022

Same author

Do I have a hearing loss?

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2021

Same author

Sound source localization is a multisystem process.

Acoustical science and technology·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2025

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

Randomizing spectral cues used to resolve front-back reversals in sound-source localization.

William A Yost¹

¹Spatial Hearing Lab, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85004, USA.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

|August 4, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Front-back reversals (FBRs) in sound localization are listener-dependent. Randomizing spectral profiles increased FBRs for high-frequency sounds, while head rotation consistently decreased FBRs.

More Related Videos

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2025

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Area of Science:

Auditory perception
Acoustic signal processing
Psychoacoustics

Background:

Front-back reversals (FBRs) are common errors in sound localization due to cone-of-confusion ambiguity.
Low-frequency sounds rely on interaural differences, leading to more FBRs than high-frequency sounds.
Spectral cues in high-frequency sounds can aid localization, but their precise role is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the influence of spectral profile randomization on FBRs.
To determine the extent to which spectral features aid sound-source localization.
To examine the effect of head rotation on FBRs.

Main Methods:

Listeners localized two-octave wide noise bands with randomly varied spectral profiles.
FBRs were quantified across different frequency bands and spectral conditions.
The impact of head rotation on FBR occurrence was assessed.

Main Results:

Randomizing spectral profiles increased FBRs for high-frequency noise bands.
This randomization likely diminished the usefulness of spectral cues, increasing reliance on ambiguous interaural differences.
Head rotation consistently reduced FBRs, irrespective of spectral profile randomization.

Conclusions:

Spectral profile randomization can impair sound localization by reducing the effectiveness of spectral cues.
Interaural differences become more dominant for localization when spectral cues are degraded.
Head rotation is an effective strategy for reducing front-back confusion in sound localization.