Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Extra-cochlear implants: the patient's viewpoint.

C A East, H R Cooper

    British Journal of Audiology
    |February 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Wegener's granulomatosis of the orbit: two cases requiring endoscopic surgical decompression.

    The Journal of laryngology and otology·2008
    Same author

    Prophylactic vs postoperative antibiotic use in complex septorhinoplasty surgery: a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial comparing efficacy.

    Archives of facial plastic surgery·2006
    Same author

    Gold weight implants in the management of lagophthalmos in facial palsy.

    Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2004
    Same author

    Multicenter audiometric results with the Vibrant Soundbridge, a semi-implantable hearing device for sensorineural hearing impairment.

    Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2001
    Same author

    Development of the Midland adult cochlear implant programme.

    The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement·2000
    Same author

    Outcomes from adult implantation, the first 100 patients.

    The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement·2000
    Same journal

    Effects of slow- and fast-acting compression on the detection of gaps in narrow bands of noise.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Measurement of first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Assessing service quality in paediatric audiology and early deaf education.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Use of the 'real-ear to dial difference' to derive real-ear SPL from hearing level obtained with insert earphones.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    See all related articles

    Cochlear implants significantly improve environmental sound awareness and speech loudness for patients. However, enhanced speech reading and tinnitus relief show limited benefits after one year of use.

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Otorhinolaryngology
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Cochlear implantation is a complex audiological procedure for severe to profound hearing loss.
    • Assessing patient-reported outcomes is crucial for refining cochlear implant (CI) management.
    • Long-term benefits and challenges require subjective evaluation from the patient's perspective.

    Observation:

    • A subjective questionnaire assessed cochlear implantee experiences after one year.
    • The study focused on patient-perceived benefits and challenges.
    • Data was collected from three patients with one year of CI usage.

    Findings:

    • The primary benefits reported were improved environmental sound perception and speech loudness modulation.
    • Enhanced speech reading ability was not a major benefit for most patients, except in specific listening environments.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Tinnitus alleviation was minimal, reported by only one of the three participants.

    • Implications:

    • Patient-reported outcomes provide valuable insights for managing future cochlear implant candidates.
    • The findings highlight specific areas where CI technology excels and where further improvements may be needed.
    • Subjective feedback is essential for optimizing rehabilitation strategies and patient expectations post-implantation.