Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring Autism Spectrum Disorder Symptoms in Fruit Flies — Genetic Models and Behavioral Tests
Published on: September 6, 2024
Neurodevelopmental risk and adaptation as a model for comorbidity among internalizing and externalizing disorders:
Nanyu Kuang1,2, Zhaowen Liu3, Gechang Yu1,2
1Institute of Science and Technology for Brain Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Childhood mental disorders often co-occur. This study found that comorbid internalizing and externalizing disorders lead to greater reductions in cortical surface area, suggesting an additive effect, but a non-linear effect on cortical thickness.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Genetics
Background:
- Comorbidity in childhood and adolescent mental disorders is common but poorly understood.
- Neural mechanisms underlying comorbidity remain unclear.
- Predicting comorbidity occurrence is a significant challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if comorbid internalizing and externalizing disorders have an additive effect on cortical anatomical differences.
- To determine if comorbidity-associated cortical differences have a distinct genetic basis.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of cortical surface area (SA) and thickness (CT) in 11,878 preadolescents (9-10 years) from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study.
- Use of linear mixed models for comparative and association analyses across diagnostic groups (internalizing, externalizing, comorbid, healthy controls).
- Genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) and cell type specificity analysis on 4468 unrelated European participants.
Main Results:
- Patient groups showed smaller cortical SA and higher CT compared to controls.
- Comorbid internalizing and externalizing disorders exhibited more pronounced SA reduction (additive effect).
- Cortical thickness showed a non-linear effect: comorbid group had no significant CT differences, while non-comorbid patients had higher CT than controls.
- Distinct biological pathways implicated: CT differences linked to immune processes (astrocytes, oligodendrocytes), SA differences linked to inhibitory neurons.
Conclusions:
- Comorbidity in psychopathology is unlikely solely due to additive neurobiological effects.
- Distinct developmental risks, immune-related adaptations, and unique genetic/cell-specific factors contribute to SA and CT differences.
- Children with high risk and low resilience, reflected in brain morphometry, may develop comorbid illness patterns.
Related Concept Videos
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Gene-Environment Interactions
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Biological Causes of Schizophrenia
Genetic Factors in Schizophrenia
The genetic basis of schizophrenia is strongly supported by family and twin...
Depressive Disorders: Etiology
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...

