Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Cost-effective analysis of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe symptomatic aortic
Makoto Amaki1, Kensuke Moriwaki2, Michikazu Nakai3
1Department of Heart Failure and Transplant, Division of Heart Failure, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Japan.
Insights
Selecting patients for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) improves cost-effectiveness in Japan. This approach is more economical than TAVR for all patients, optimizing resource allocation for severe aortic stenosis treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) requires treatment, but transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) benefits are not universal.
- Investigating the cost-effectiveness of TAVR in a Japanese population is crucial for optimizing healthcare resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different TAVR strategies in a Japanese cohort with severe symptomatic AS.
- To identify patient selection criteria that maximize the benefits of TAVR.
Main Methods:
- A prospective multicenter study enrolled 110 symptomatic severe AS patients undergoing TAVR.
- Quality of life (QOL) was assessed pre- and 6-months post-TAVR; non-responders were identified.
- Three treatment models were simulated: conservative, TAVR for all, and TAVR for selected responders.
Main Results:
- The TAVR for selected patients strategy yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 2,342,175 yen/QALY, below the 5,000,000 yen/QALY threshold.
- The TAVR for all patients strategy had an ICER of 5,765,800 yen/QALY, exceeding the threshold.
- Higher pre-TAVR QOL and clinical frailty scale predicted non-response.
Conclusions:
- A TAVR strategy selecting likely responders is more cost-effective than treating all patients in Japan.
- This selected patient approach optimizes TAVR benefits, particularly for frail individuals, and improves resource allocation.
- This strategy supports directing interventions toward those most likely to experience improved quality of life.
Background:
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) does not benefit all patients. We performed a prospective multicenter study to investigate the cost-effectiveness of TAVR in a Japanese cohort.
Methods And Results:
We prospectively enrolled 110 symptomatic patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR from five institutions. The quality of life measurement (QOL) was performed for each patient before and at 6 months after TAVR. Patients without an improvement in QOL at 6 months after TAVR were defined as non-responders. Pre-TAVR higher QOL, higher clinical frailty scale predicted the non-responders. Three models, 1) conservative treatment for all patients strategy, 2) TAVR for all patients strategy, and 3) TAVR for a selected patient strategy who is expected to be a responder, were simulated. Lifetime cost-effectiveness was estimated using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. In comparison to conservative therapy for all patients, ICER was estimated to be 5,765,800 yen/QALY for TAVR for all patients and 2,342,175 yen/QALY for TAVR for selected patient strategy patients, which is less than the commonly accepted ICER threshold of 5,000,000 yen/QALY.
Conclusions:
TAVR for selected patient strategy model is more cost-effective than TAVR for all patient strategy without reducing QOL in the Japanese healthcare system. TAVR for selected patient strategy has potential benefit for optimizing the TAVR treatment in patients with high frailty and may direct our resources toward beneficial interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

