Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

A Detailed Protocol for Physiological Parameters Acquisition and Analysis in Neurosurgical Critical Patients
Published on: October 17, 2017
A Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) and Pleth Variability Index (PVI) for
Pratyasa Nayak1, Subrata Kumar Singha1, Monica Khetrapal1
1Department of Anaesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Services - Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) using Pleth Variability Index (PVI) or pulse pressure variation (PPV) showed no significant difference in neurosurgery patients. Both methods had limited accuracy in guiding fluid management.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Critical Care Medicine
- Neurosurgery
Background:
- Perioperative fluid management remains challenging, especially in neurosurgery due to diuretic use.
- Dynamic parameters for fluid responsiveness, like GDFT, are increasingly used but their efficacy in neurosurgery is not well-established.
- Intracranial space occupying lesions (ICSOLs) present unique fluid management considerations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of Pleth Variability Index (PVI) versus pulse pressure variation (PPV) in guiding goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) during neurosurgery for supratentorial ICSOLs.
- To evaluate the impact of PVI- and PPV-guided GDFT on postoperative serum lactate levels as a marker of tissue perfusion.
- To assess other postoperative outcomes including fluid administration, blood loss, CCU stay, and complications.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 74 patients undergoing neurosurgery for supratentorial ICSOLs.
- Patients were randomized into either PVI-guided or PPV-guided GDFT groups.
- Fluid management involved a baseline infusion and additional boluses triggered by PVI (>15%) or PPV (>13%) thresholds.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was observed in postoperative lactate levels between the PVI and PPV groups (P=0.18).
- Mean total fluid administered, blood loss, CCU stay, and episodes of emesis or hypotension also showed no significant differences between the groups.
- Both PVI and PPV demonstrated low sensitivity and specificity in guiding GDFT, with areas under the curve of 0.423 for PVI and 0.577 for PPV.
Conclusions:
- In neurosurgery patients with supratentorial ICSOLs, PVI-guided GDFT is comparable to PPV-guided GDFT in terms of tissue perfusion and postoperative complications.
- Both PVI and PPV have limitations in accurately guiding GDFT in this specific patient population.
- Further research may be needed to refine dynamic parameters for fluid management in complex neurosurgical cases.
More Related Videos
06:18A Bedside, Single Burr Hole Approach to Multimodality Monitoring in Severe Brain Injury
Published on: March 26, 2019
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
Published on: May 10, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.