Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Differences between patients in whom physicians agree versus disagree about the preoperative diagnosis of heart
Reed W Kamyszek1, Noah Newman1, Jacqueline W Ragheb1
1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Study Objective:
To quantify preoperative heart failure (HF) diagnostic agreement and identify characteristics of patients in whom physicians agreed versus disagreed about the diagnosis.
Design:
Observational cohort study.
Setting:
Patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery at an academic center between 2015 and 2019.
Patients:
40,659 patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery, among which a stratified subsample of 1018 patients with and without documented HF was reviewed.
Interventions:
Via a panel of physicians frequently managing patients with HF (cardiologists, cardiac anesthesiologists, intensivists), detailed chart reviews were performed (two per patient; median review time 32 min per reviewer per patient) to render adjudicated HF diagnoses.
Measurements:
Adjudicated diagnostic agreement measures (percent agreement, Krippendorf's alpha) and univariate comparisons (standardized differences) between patients in whom physicians agreed versus disagreed about the preoperative HF diagnosis.
Main Results:
Among patients with documented HF, physicians agreed about the diagnosis in 80.0% of cases (consensus positive), disagreed in 13.8% (disagreement), and refuted the diagnosis in 6.3% (consensus negative). Conversely, among patients without documented HF, physicians agreed about the diagnosis in 88.0% (consensus negative), disagreed in 8.4% (disagreement), and refuted the diagnosis in 3.6% (consensus positive). The estimated agreement for the 40,659 cases was 91.1% (95% CI 88.3%-93.9%); Krippendorff's alpha was 0.77 (0.75-0.80). Compared to patients in whom physicians agreed about a HF diagnosis, patients in whom physicians disagreed exhibited fewer guideline-defined HF diagnostic criteria.
Conclusions:
Physicians usually agree about HF diagnoses adjudicated via chart review, although disagreement is not uncommon and may be partly explained by heterogeneous clinical presentations. Our findings inform preoperative screening processes by identifying patients whose characteristics contribute to physician disagreement via chart review. Clinical Trial Number / Registry URL: Not applicable.
More Related Videos
05:15Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care