Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Cochlear implant electronics made simple.

R P Fravel

    Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
    |May 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Cochlear implant electronics are evolving, with variations making an optimal configuration hard to predict. Further research into the damaged auditory system may be aided by these advanced hearing devices.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Design and function: a physical and electrical description of the 3M House cochlear implant system.

    Ear and hearingยท1985
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Neuroscience
    • Audiology

    Background:

    • Cochlear implants have evolved significantly since their inception in 1957.
    • While signal processing (amplification, compression, filtering, encoding) is common, electronic variations exist among systems.
    • The complex pathology of the auditory system presents challenges for a universal optimal electronic configuration.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the electronic variations in cochlear implant systems.
    • To discuss the challenges in predicting the optimum electronic configuration for cochlear implants.
    • To consider the potential for cochlear implants to enhance understanding of the auditory system.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of existing cochlear implant electronic systems.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of signal processing techniques.
  • Discussion of the biological system's pathology and its impact on device function.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant electronic variations exist across different cochlear implant systems.
    • Predicting an optimal electronic configuration is challenging due to ongoing research and development.
    • The pathology of the auditory system implies no single best electronic solution.

    Conclusions:

    • Cochlear implant electronics, while seemingly straightforward, exhibit considerable variation.
    • The evolving nature of cochlear implant technology and the complexity of the auditory system necessitate continued research.
    • Cochlear implants may offer insights into the damaged auditory system while restoring hearing function.