The Diagnostic Performance of Laboratory Tests of Neurosyphilis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

The gold standard for diagnosing neurosyphilis (NS) is currently unavailable; various laboratory parameters in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood can assist in the diagnosis.

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Studies utilizing laboratory tests to assist in the diagnosis of NS were included. The pooled indicators for diagnostic performance and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. We used the superiority index to test the superiority of a diagnostic test.

Eleven citations were included in the study. Albumin quotient, CSF-TPHA, CSF-EIA, CSF-LDH, CSF-WBC, CSF-CXCL13, FTA-ABS, CSF-PCR, RPR, CSF-TPPA, TRUST, and CSF-venereal diseases research laboratory (VDRL) were assessed in the studies included. The pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, AUC of SROC and their respective 95% CIs for CSF-TPPA and CSF-VDRL were 0.97 (0.17, 1.00), 0.84 (0.62, 0.95), 0.93 (0.91, 0.95) and 0.74 (0.59, 0.85), 0.99 (0.93, 1.00), 0.94 (0.91, 0.96), respectively. CSF-TPHA demonstrated the highest relative sensitivity. CSF-VDRL manifested the highest specificity. CSF-TPHA, TRUST, CSF-VDRL, CSF-EIA, and RPR ranked in the top five laboratory tests with superiority index.

CSF-TPHA, TRUST, CSF-VDRL, CSF-EIA, and RPR indicate acceptable performance in detecting NS compared to other modalities. Comprehensive diagnostic strategies still play a significant role in the diagnosis of NS.