Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems PEMS for the Real-driving Emissions RDE Regulation in Europe
Published on: December 4, 2016
Development of the national Dutch PEWS: the challenge against heterogeneity and implementation difficulties of PEWS
Joris Fuijkschot1, Jikke Stevens2, Lara Teheux2
1Radboud University Medical Center, Radboudumc Amalia Childrens Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. joris.fuijkschot@radboudumc.nl.
Insights
A national consensus Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) system was developed to address heterogeneity in Dutch hospitals. This pragmatic system includes core parameters and risk stratification for early recognition of deteriorating pediatric patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care medicine
- Healthcare systems research
- Clinical informatics
Background:
- Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) systems aim for early recognition of deteriorating patients to prevent adverse events.
- Existing PEWS in Dutch hospitals show significant heterogeneity, with many unvalidated or self-designed systems.
- Lack of a national consensus hinders consistent application and validation of PEWS in the Netherlands.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a pragmatic, consensus-based Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) system for universal use across all Dutch hospitals.
- To establish a standardized national PEWS to mitigate heterogeneity and improve patient safety.
- To create a validated tool for early detection of critical illness in pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- An iterative mixed-methods approach, guided by the COMET initiative principles.
- Involved two Delphi rounds with 292 and 217 healthcare professionals, respectively.
- Included hospital inventories, a parent focus group, expert meetings, and a final consensus meeting.
Main Results:
- A core PEWS set was developed, incorporating work of breathing, respiratory rate, oxygen therapy, heart rate, capillary refill time, and AVPU scale.
- Risk stratification was integrated with standardized factors (worried signs, high-risk treatment) and three risk categories (standard, medium, high).
- Standardized actions for healthcare professionals were defined for each risk category.
Conclusions:
- This study presents a solution to national PEWS heterogeneity through co-design of a unified Dutch PEWS system.
- The developed PEWS system offers a pragmatic and consensus-based approach for early recognition of deteriorating pediatric patients.
- The effectiveness of this national PEWS system is currently under investigation in a large multi-center study.
Background:
For the early recognition of deteriorating patients several Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) systems have been developed with the assumption that early detection can prevent further deterioration. Although PEWS are widely being used in hospitals in the Netherlands, there is no national consensus on which score to use and how to embed the score into a PEWS system. This resulted in a substantial heterogeneity of PEWS systems, of which many are unvalidated or self-designed. The primary objective of this study was to develop a pragmatic consensus-based PEWS system that can be utilized in all Dutch hospitals (University Medical Centers, teaching hospitals, and general hospitals).
Methods:
This study is an iterative mixed-methods study. The methods from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative were used and consisted of two Delphi rounds, two inventories set out to all Dutch hospitals and a focus group session with parents. The study was guided by five expert meetings with different stakeholders and a final consensus meeting that resulted in a core PEWS set.
Results:
The first Delphi round was completed by 292 healthcare professionals, consisting of pediatric nurses and physicians. In the second Delphi round 217 healthcare professionals participated. Eventually, the core PEWS set was been developed comprising of the parameters work of breathing, respiratory rate, oxygen therapy, heart rate and capillary refill time, and AVPU (Alert, Verbal, Pain, and Unresponsive). In addition, risk stratification was added to the core set with standardized risk factors consisting of [1] worried signs from healthcare professionals and parents and [2] high-risk treatment, with the option to add applicable local defined risk factors. Lastly, the three categories of risk stratification were defined (standard, medium, and high risk) in combination with standardized actions of the professionals for each category.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates a way to end a country's struggle with PEWS heterogeneity by co-designing a national Dutch PEWS system. Currently, the power of the system is being investigated in a large multi-center study in the Netherlands.
Related Concept Videos
The Nativist Approach
Horney's Sociocultural Approach
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Polymorphism, Amorphism and Pseudopolymorphism
Some polymorphic crystals possess lower aqueous solubility than their amorphous counterparts, leading to incomplete absorption. For instance, the oral suspension of Chloramphenicol, which...
Social Proof
Methods of Documentation III: PIE

