Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Scoping Review of Measures of Comorbidities in Heart Failure
Insights
Assessing comorbidities in heart failure patients is crucial for predicting outcomes, but current methods lack standardization. This review highlights inconsistencies in comorbidity measurement, emphasizing the need for clear guidelines to improve clinical outcome prediction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Research Methodology
Background:
- Comorbidities significantly impact heart failure patient outcomes.
- Standardized methods for assessing comorbidities in heart failure are lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review comorbidity assessment methods in heart failure research.
- To identify chronic conditions studied as comorbidities.
- To evaluate the rationale behind selecting comorbidity assessment tools and specific conditions.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review of 39 articles.
- Searches across three electronic databases and reference lists.
- Analysis of comorbidity assessment strategies (instruments, disease counts, individual conditions).
Main Results:
- Three assessment approaches were identified: using instruments (e.g., Charlson Comorbidity Index), disease counts, and individual comorbidities.
- Ninety comorbidities were analyzed, but definitions and labels were inconsistent.
- Over half of studies (22/39) lacked a clear rationale for instrument or comorbidity selection, with some rationales being inappropriate.
Conclusions:
- Significant methodological issues exist in measuring comorbidities for heart failure clinical outcomes.
- Researchers must address these issues for accurate comorbidity assessment.
- Development of guidelines for selecting appropriate comorbidity measures is necessary.
Background:
Comorbidities are risk factors for poor clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure. However, no consensus has been reached on how to assess comorbidities related to clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure.
Objective:
The aims of this study were to review (1) how comorbidities have been assessed, (2) what chronic conditions have been identified as comorbidities and (3) the rationale for choosing the comorbidity instruments and/or specific comorbidities when exploring clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure.
Methods:
The clinical outcomes of interest were mortality, hospitalization, quality of life, and self-care. Three electronic databases and reference list searches were used in the search.
Results:
In this review, we included 39 articles using 3 different ways to assess comorbidities in the relationship with clinical outcomes: using an instrument (ie, Charlson Comorbidity Index), disease count, and including individual comorbidities. A total of 90 comorbidities were investigated in the 39 articles; however, definitions and labels for the diseases were inconsistent across the studies. More than half of the studies (n = 22) did not provide a rationale for selecting the comorbidity instruments and/or all of the specific comorbidities. Some of the rationale for choosing the instruments and/or specific comorbidities was inappropriate.
Conclusions:
We found several issues related to measuring comorbidities when examining clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure. Researchers need to consider these methodological issues when measuring comorbidities in patients with heart failure. Further efforts are needed to develop guidelines on how to choose proper measures for comorbidities.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

