Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.

K J Doyle, J L Danhauer, B J Edgerton

    Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
    |June 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Delayed, reversible hearing loss caused by difluoromethylornithine (DFMO).

    The Laryngoscope·2001
    Same author

    Effects of difluoromethylornithine chemoprevention on audiometry thresholds and otoacoustic emissions.

    Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2001
    Same author

    Choristoma of the middle ear: a component of a new syndrome?

    Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2001
    Same author

    A holistic model for matching high-tech hearing aid features to elderly patients.

    American journal of audiology·2001
    Same author

    External and middle ear effects on infant hearing screening test results.

    Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2000
    Same author

    Neurotologic follow-up after radiation of posterior fossa tumors.

    The American journal of otology·2000
    Same journal

    Temporal resolution in infancy and subsequent language development.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Evidence of sensitivity to structural contrasts in the literature on children's language comprehension.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Narrative development in late talkers: early school age.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    A system for the diagnosis of specific language impairment in kindergarten children.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Interactive focused stimulation for toddlers with expressive vocabulary delays.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Auditory lexical decisions of children with specific language impairment.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    See all related articles

    Cochlear implant users struggle with vowel sounds, primarily using fundamental (F0) and first formant (F1) frequencies. They cannot effectively utilize second formant (F2) information crucial for accurate speech recognition.

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Speech Perception
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Cochlear implants (CI) are vital for postlingually deaf adults with hearing aid failure.
    • Understanding vowel perception in CI users is critical for improving speech intelligibility.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate vowel perception features utilized by cochlear implant users.
    • To compare CI user perception with normal-hearing controls.

    Main Methods:

    • 15 postlingually deaf adult CI users and 2 normal-hearing controls participated.
    • Subjects rated dissimilarity and identified 11 American English vowels.
    • Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering analyzed perceptual features.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Normal-hearing subjects used second formant (F2) frequency.
    • CI users primarily relied on fundamental (F0) and first formant (F1) frequencies.
    • CI users exhibited significant difficulty in vowel identification, with F2 information not correlating with perceived dimensions.

    Conclusions:

    • Cochlear implant users' vowel perception differs significantly from normal-hearing individuals.
    • Reliance on F0 and F1, and lack of F2 utilization, limits speech recognition capabilities in CI users.
    • Current CI technology may not fully restore the spectral information necessary for robust vowel perception.