Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025
Novel Methods for Intranasal Administration Under Inhalation Anesthesia to Evaluate Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery
Published on: November 14, 2018
The Impact of Various High-Flow Nasal Cannula Devices on Transnasal Aerosol Delivery
1Division of Respiratory Care, Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois.
Background:
Aerosol delivery via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has gained popularity due to the increased use of the modality for treating hypoxemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure. Various HFNC devices are available in the United States; however, the effectiveness of aerosol delivery via HFNC devices remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the impact of various commercially available devices on transnasal aerosol delivery.
Methods:
This was a bench study that used a 2-chamber lung model, in which one chamber was connected to an adult manikin with anatomically correct upper-airway proportions. The other chamber was connected to a critical care ventilator used to simulate spontaneous breathing. A size large nasal cannula was placed at the nasal opening of the manikin. Five different HFNC devices (Hamilton-C1, OptiFlow, Airvo2, V60 Plus, and Vapotherm) were compared. Four flow settings were used on each device, with a vibrating mesh nebulizer placed at the humidifier. Salbutamol (2.5 mg/3 mL) was used during the experiments to quantify inhaled drug doses. A collection filter was placed between the manikin's trachea and the lung model. The drug was eluted from the filter and assayed with ultraviolet spectrophotometry (276 nm).
Results:
Among the 5 HFNC devices, OptiFlow had the highest inhaled dose at 10 L/min (mean ± SD 18.2% ± 1.2%). At 20 L/min, the Hamilton-C1 (mean ± SD 13.5% ± 0.4%) performed marginally better than the OptiFlow (mean ± SD 12.6% ± 1.9%) and Airvo2 (mean ± SD 12.8% ± 1%). At high flow settings (40-60 L/min), the inhaled dose of Hamilton-C1 was 2-3 times that of the Airvo2 and V60 Plus. When compared with the other devices, the mean inhaled dose with the Vapotherm was lower (0.9-2.5%). In all devices, the inhaled dose decreased as the flow increased.
Conclusions:
Transnasal aerosol delivery was significantly impacted by the types of HFNC devices and flow settings. Nominal doses might need to be adjusted if changing HFNC devices or flow is not an option.
More Related Videos
15:04Modeling and Simulations of Olfactory Drug Delivery with Passive and Active Controls of Nasally Inhaled Pharmaceutical Aerosols
Published on: May 20, 2016
07:28Dry Powder and Nebulized Aerosol Inhalation of Pharmaceuticals Delivered to Mice Using a Nose-only Exposure System
Published on: April 6, 2017
Related Concept Videos
01:29Administering Oxygen by Nasal Cannula
Nasal Cannulas
A nasal cannula is a lightweight tube split into two prongs placed in the nostrils,...
01:26Oxygen Delivering System I: Nasal Cannula and Face Mask
Nasal Cannula
A nasal cannula is a lightweight tube split at one end into two prongs and placed in the nostrils. It is typically used to deliver low to medium levels of oxygen.
Suggested flow rate: The suggested flow rate for a nasal cannula typically ranges between 1 and 6 L/min.
Oxygen percentage setting:...
01:16Oxygen Delivering System II: Venturi Mask and Transtracheal Oxygen
Venturi Mask
The Venturi mask, named after the Venturi effect, is designed to deliver precise oxygen concentrations. It consists of a large tube with an oxygen inlet that narrows down, causing a pressure drop that pulls air in through adjustable side ports. The mask is a lightweight,...
01:29Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
01:23Inhaled Medications
01:23Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...