Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Color Vision01:24

Color Vision

613
Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.
613
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

720
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
720
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cpeb4 regulates cardiomyocyte apoptosis in heart failure with association to Eif4a2 splicing modulation.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The N‑Glycoproteomic Landscape of the Lung in Monocrotaline-Induced Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

ACE2 ameliorates DOX-induced cardiotoxicity by suppressing excessive autophagy via the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway.

Biochemical pharmacology·2026
Same author

Analysis of the epidemiological features and factors associated with falls among the elderly in urban and rural areas of Chongqing, China: a cross-sectional study.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Global, regional, and national trends in blindness and vision loss, 1990-2021: a secondary ecological trend analysis based on modelled population estimates.

Journal of global health·2026
Same author

SignMoD: Sign Language Video Generation via Mixture of Diffusion.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

460

Reducing Vision-Answer Biases for Multiple-Choice VQA.

Xi Zhang, Feifei Zhang, Changsheng Xu

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing : a Publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society
    |August 9, 2023
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a new method to improve visual question answering (VQA) by addressing vision-answer bias. The Causality-based Multimodal Interaction Enhancement (CMIE) method enhances VQA model performance and generalization.

    More Related Videos

    Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping
    07:11

    Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping

    Published on: December 8, 2023

    1.6K
    Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
    07:45

    Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

    Published on: July 21, 2020

    4.5K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 19, 2025

    Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
    07:12

    Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

    Published on: April 11, 2025

    460
    Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping
    07:11

    Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping

    Published on: December 8, 2023

    1.6K
    Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
    07:45

    Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

    Published on: July 21, 2020

    4.5K

    Area of Science:

    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Computer Vision
    • Natural Language Processing

    Background:

    • Multiple-choice visual question answering (VQA) requires deep multimodal understanding and reasoning.
    • Existing VQA models often rely on multimodal interaction modules but can suffer from vision-answer bias, hindering performance and generalization.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a novel, model-agnostic method to mitigate vision-answer bias in VQA.
    • To enhance the robustness and accuracy of VQA models through improved inter-modality reasoning.

    Main Methods:

    • Introduced the Causality-based Multimodal Interaction Enhancement (CMIE) method.
    • CMIE incorporates a causal intervention module to eliminate spurious correlations and a counterfactual interaction learning module for supervised multimodal training.
    • Designed as a plug-and-play component for existing VQA architectures.

    Main Results:

    • The CMIE method significantly improved the performance of seven representative VQA models across multiple benchmarks.
    • Demonstrated enhanced generalization capabilities of VQA models when integrated with CMIE.
    • Effectively addressed the identified vision-answer bias in VQA tasks.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed CMIE method offers an effective solution to vision-answer bias in VQA.
    • CMIE enhances the reliability and generalization of various VQA approaches.
    • This causality-based approach advances multimodal understanding in AI.