Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Retrospective comparison of traditional and artificial intelligence-based heart failure phenotyping in a US health
Arthur Reshad Garan1, Keri L Monda2, Ricardo E Dent-Acosta2
1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA agaran@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Objective:
Quantitatively evaluate the quality of data underlying real-world evidence (RWE) in heart failure (HF).
Design:
Retrospective comparison of accuracy in identifying patients with HF and phenotypic information was made using traditional (ie, structured query language applied to structured electronic health record (EHR) data) and advanced (ie, artificial intelligence (AI) applied to unstructured EHR data) RWE approaches. The performance of each approach was measured by the harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1 score) using manual annotation of medical records as a reference standard.
Setting:
EHR data from a large academic healthcare system in North America between 2015 and 2019, with an expected catchment of approximately 5 00 000 patients.
Population:
4288 encounters for 1155 patients aged 18-85 years, with 472 patients identified as having HF.
Outcome Measures:
HF and associated concepts, such as comorbidities, left ventricular ejection fraction, and selected medications.
Results:
The average F1 scores across 19 HF-specific concepts were 49.0% and 94.1% for the traditional and advanced approaches, respectively (p<0.001 for all concepts with available data). The absolute difference in F1 score between approaches was 45.1% (98.1% relative increase in F1 score using the advanced approach). The advanced approach achieved superior F1 scores for HF presence, phenotype and associated comorbidities. Some phenotypes, such as HF with preserved ejection fraction, revealed dramatic differences in extraction accuracy based on technology applied, with a 4.9% F1 score when using natural language processing (NLP) alone and a 91.0% F1 score when using NLP plus AI-based inference.
Conclusions:
A traditional RWE generation approach resulted in low data quality in patients with HF. While an advanced approach demonstrated high accuracy, the results varied dramatically based on extraction techniques. For future studies, advanced approaches and accuracy measurement may be required to ensure data are fit-for-purpose.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
07:41Induction and Phenotyping of Acute Right Heart Failure in a Large Animal Model of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
Published on: March 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies