Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Immunohistochemical Staining of B7-H1 PD-L1 on Paraffin-embedded Slides of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Tissue
Published on: January 3, 2013
Dual Blockade of EP2 and EP4 Signaling is Required for Optimal Immune Activation and Antitumor Activity Against
Brian J Francica1, Anja Holtz1, Justine Lopez1
1Tempest Therapeutics, Brisbane, California.
Abstract:
While the role of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in promoting malignant progression is well established, how to optimally block the activity of PGE2 signaling remains to be demonstrated. Clinical trials with prostaglandin pathway targeted agents have shown activity but without sufficient significance or dose-limiting toxicities that have prevented approval. PGE2 signals through four receptors (EP1-4) to modulate tumor progression. EP2 and EP4 signaling exacerbates tumor pathology and is immunosuppressive through potentiating cAMP production. EP1 and EP3 signaling has the opposite effect through increasing IP3 and decreasing cAMP. Using available small-molecule antagonists of single EP receptors, the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor celecoxib, or a novel dual EP2/EP4 antagonist generated in this investigation, we tested which approach to block PGE2 signaling optimally restored immunologic activity in mouse and human immune cells and antitumor activity in syngeneic, spontaneous, and xenograft tumor models. We found that dual antagonism of EP2 and EP4 together significantly enhanced the activation of PGE2-suppressed mouse and human monocytes and CD8+ T cells in vitro as compared with single EP antagonists. CD8+ T-cell activation was dampened by single EP1 and EP3 antagonists. Dual EP2/EP4 PGE2 receptor antagonists increased tumor microenvironment lymphocyte infiltration and significantly reduced disease burden in multiple tumor models, including in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)min+/- spontaneous colorectal tumor model, compared with celecoxib. These results support a hypothesis that redundancy of EP2 and EP4 receptor signaling necessitates a therapeutic strategy of dual blockade of EP2 and EP4. Here we describe TPST-1495, a first-in-class orally available small-molecule dual EP2/EP4 antagonist.
Significance:
Prostaglandin (PGE2) drives tumor progression but the pathway has not been effectively drugged. We demonstrate significantly enhanced immunologic potency and antitumor activity through blockade of EP2 and EP4 PGE2 receptor signaling together with a single molecule.
Insights
Dual blockade of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) receptors EP2 and EP4 enhances immune cell activation and reduces tumor burden. This strategy, using a novel dual antagonist, shows superior antitumor activity compared to single receptor blockade or COX-2 inhibitors.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is a key mediator of tumor progression, but effective therapeutic strategies to block its signaling remain elusive.
- PGE2 exerts its effects through four receptors (EP1-4), with EP2 and EP4 signaling promoting tumor growth and immune suppression.
- Existing treatments targeting the prostaglandin pathway have shown limited efficacy or dose-limiting toxicities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the optimal strategy for blocking PGE2 signaling to restore anti-tumor immunity.
- To evaluate the efficacy of a novel dual EP2/EP4 antagonist compared to single EP receptor antagonists and a COX-2 inhibitor.
Main Methods:
- Utilized small-molecule antagonists targeting single EP receptors and a novel dual EP2/EP4 antagonist.
- Assessed the activation of mouse and human immune cells (monocytes, CD8+ T cells) *in vitro*.
- Tested antitumor activity in syngeneic, spontaneous (APCmin+/-), and xenograft tumor models.
Main Results:
- Dual antagonism of EP2 and EP4 significantly enhanced immune cell activation compared to single EP antagonists.
- CD8+ T-cell activation was suppressed by single EP1 and EP3 antagonists.
- Dual EP2/EP4 antagonism increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and reduced tumor burden across multiple models, outperforming celecoxib.
Conclusions:
- Redundancy in EP2 and EP4 signaling necessitates a dual blockade strategy for optimal therapeutic benefit.
- The novel dual EP2/EP4 antagonist, TPST-1495, demonstrates significant immunologic and antitumor potential.
- TPST-1495 represents a promising first-in-class orally available therapeutic for cancer treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce peptic ulcers by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, decreasing...
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
The Tumor Microenvironment
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Tumor Immunotherapy

