Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Words and hemifields: do the hemispheres enjoy equal opportunity?

K Kirsner, S Schwartz

    Brain and Cognition
    |July 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    Research on cerebral asymmetry using visual displays may be flawed. Perceptual factors, not brain hemispheres, likely explain visual field advantages in word recognition tasks.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    An analysis of the visual component in recognition memory for verbal stimuli.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    Modality effects in word identification.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    The representation of "false cognates" in the bilingual lexicon.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
    Same author

    Predicting transfer from training performance.

    Acta psychologica·2001
    Same author

    Knowledge partitioning: context-dependent use of expertise.

    Memory & cognition·2000
    Same author

    The role of sub-lexical orthography in naming: a performance and acoustic analysis.

    Acta psychologica·1999

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Neuroscience
    • Visual Perception
    • Cerebral Asymmetry Research

    Background:

    • Lateralized visual displays are common in studying cerebral asymmetry.
    • This technique relies on implicit assumptions about cognitive processing, such as whole-word or ends-in analysis for word recognition.
    • These assumptions are critical for interpreting results related to hemispheric specialization.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To question the necessity of hemispheric specialization theories for explaining visual field asymmetries.
    • To propose that perceptual principles offer a more parsimonious explanation for observed asymmetries.
    • To re-evaluate the interpretation of right visual field advantages in word recognition tasks.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of implicit assumptions in lateralized visual display research.
    • Examination of word recognition and classification tasks.
    • Application of perceptual principles to explain visual field differences.

    Main Results:

    • The right visual field advantage in word recognition tasks can be explained by perceptual factors.
    • These factors include biases favoring initial word characters and the relationship between visual acuity and retinal eccentricity.
    • A hemispheric account is not required to explain these observed visual field differences.

    Conclusions:

    • Established perceptual principles provide a sufficient explanation for visual field asymmetries in word recognition.
    • The reliance on hemispheric specialization theories may be unnecessary and less parsimonious.
    • Revisiting the foundational assumptions in cerebral asymmetry research is crucial for accurate interpretation.

    Related Experiment Videos