Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Behavioral or hemispheric asymmetry: is there a default option?

S Schwartz, K Kirsner

    Brain and Cognition
    |July 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    Acuity gradients in hemifield research are important but their role is debated. This study clarifies their impact on word recognition and visual field interactions, addressing key questions in cognitive science.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    An analysis of the visual component in recognition memory for verbal stimuli.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    Modality effects in word identification.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    The representation of "false cognates" in the bilingual lexicon.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
    Same author

    Predicting transfer from training performance.

    Acta psychologica·2001
    Same author

    Knowledge partitioning: context-dependent use of expertise.

    Memory & cognition·2000
    Same author

    The role of sub-lexical orthography in naming: a performance and acoustic analysis.

    Acta psychologica·1999

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Visual Perception

    Background:

    • Acuity gradients are acknowledged as a moderating variable in hemifield research.
    • The precise role of acuity gradients in determining hemifield differences remains unclear.
    • Previous research has raised questions regarding visual display controls and word recognition mechanisms.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate whether vertical displays adequately control for acuity gradients in hemifield studies.
    • To determine the significance of initial letters in word recognition, considering information theory and lexical organization.
    • To compare the explanatory power of behavioral versus hemispheric accounts for Task Level X Visual Field interactions.

    Main Methods:

    • This study is a theoretical reply, critically analyzing existing data and arguments.
    • It addresses specific comments by Bryden (1986) and Hellige (1986) on Kirsner & Schwartz (1986).
    • The analysis focuses on the interpretation of experimental findings related to visual field processing.

    Main Results:

    • The study evaluates the appropriateness of vertical displays as controls for acuity gradients.
    • It examines the contribution of initial letter information to word recognition processes.
    • The relative merits of behavioral and hemispheric explanations for visual field interactions are discussed.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings contribute to a clearer understanding of acuity gradients' role in hemifield research.
    • This work refines theories on visual word recognition and hemispheric specialization.
    • It provides a framework for resolving debates on visual field processing and its underlying mechanisms.

    Related Experiment Videos