Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Equivalence testing to judge model fit: A Monte Carlo simulation.
James L Peugh1, Kaylee Litson2, David F Feldon2
1Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Equivalence testing for structural equation model (SEM) fit is unreliable. This Monte Carlo simulation found that RMSEA and CFI equivalence tests perform inconsistently, especially with mild model misspecification.
Area of Science:
- Psychometrics
- Statistical Modeling
- Quantitative Psychology
Background:
- Traditional structural equation model (SEM) fit indices like chi-square, CFI, and RMSEA demonstrate inconsistent and unreliable performance.
- Researchers lack robust inferential alternatives for assessing SEM fit, often relying on these problematic indices.
- Equivalence testing adaptations of RMSEA and CFI (RMSEA_eq, CFI_eq) were proposed as a potential inferential solution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To empirically evaluate the accuracy of equivalence testing for SEM fit indices (RMSEA_eq, CFI_eq).
- To assess the reliability of equivalence testing across various conditions, including sample size, model specification, and data characteristics.
- To determine if equivalence testing provides a more accurate judgment of acceptable and unacceptable model fit compared to traditional methods.
Main Methods:
- A fully crossed Monte Carlo simulation was employed.
- Evaluated equivalence testing accuracy under diverse conditions: sample size (100-1,000), model specification (correct/misspecified), model type (CFA, path analysis, SEM), variable load, data distribution (normal/skewed), and missing data (0-25%).
- Used proportional z-tests and logistic regression to analyze results.
Main Results:
- Equivalence testing demonstrated inconsistent and unreliable performance across various independent variable conditions.
- The accuracy of RMSEA_eq and CFI_eq was often contingent on complex interactions between simulation conditions.
- Equivalence tests for SEM fit were found to be problematic, particularly under conditions of mild model misspecification.
Conclusions:
- Current equivalence testing approaches for SEM fit indices (RMSEA_eq, CFI_eq) are not consistently reliable.
- The effectiveness of these tests is highly dependent on specific model and data characteristics, especially misspecification.
- Researchers should exercise caution when using equivalence testing for SEM fit until further research and development address its limitations.
Related Concept Videos
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Modeling and Similitude
Goodness-of-Fit Test
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.

