Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
Impact of the Acuros XB spatial discretization error on ArcCHECK VMAT QA for small-field SBRT
Chuan He1,2, Ankit Pant1,2, Anh H Le2,3
1Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Purpose:
To evaluate the impact of the Acuros XB spatial discretization errors on ArcCHECK volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) QA for small-field SBRT plans.
Methods:
Eighteen SBRT VMAT arcs that failed the ArcCHECK VMAT QA were retrospectively analyzed. Plan verification doses were calculated using Eclipse Acuros XB, and absolute 3%/2 mm gamma passing rates were calculated to compare ArcCHECK and MapCHECK2 with MapPHAN. Verification doses were recalculated using AAA in Eclipse and with the EGSnrc Monte Carlo package. In addition, error-reduced Acuros XB doses were calculated by subdividing the entire arc into several sub-arcs ("split-arc" method), with the angular ranges of the sub-arcs optimized to balance accuracy and efficiency. Relative gamma passing rates were calculated and compared for the four methods: (1) Acuros XB; (2) AAA; (3) EGSnrc Monte Carlo; and (4) the split-arc method.
Results:
The absolute gamma passing rates were below 90% for ArcCHECK and above 95% for MapCHECK2. The averaged relative gamma passing rates were (1) 84.7% for clinical Acuros XB; (2) 96.8% for AAA; (3) 98.8% for EGSnrc Monte Carlo; and (4) 96.8% for the split-arc method with 60° sub-arc angle. Compared to the clinical Acuros XB, the split-arc method improved the relative gamma passing rate by 12.1% on average. No significant difference was found between AAA and the split-arc method (p > 0.05).
Conclusion:
The Acuros XB spatial discretization errors can significantly impact the ArcCHECK VMAT QA results for small-field SBRT plans. The split-arc method may be used to improve the VMAT QA results.
