Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Frailty Status Modifies the Efficacy of ICD Therapy for Primary Prevention Among Patients With HF
Matthew W Segar1, Neil Keshvani2, Sumitabh Singh2
1Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.
Insights
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy benefits heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and low frailty. Frailty modifies ICD efficacy, showing no mortality benefit for frail HFrEF patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Geriatrics
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is recommended for reducing mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- Frailty is prevalent in HFrEF patients and linked to increased mortality.
- The impact of frailty on ICD efficacy in HFrEF requires clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess if baseline frailty modifies the efficacy of ICD therapy for primary prevention in HFrEF patients.
- Investigate the interaction between frailty burden and ICD treatment effect on all-cause mortality.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1,676 HFrEF participants from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) randomized to ICD or placebo.
- Frailty was quantified using the Rockwood Frailty Index (FI) and stratified into low (≤ median) and high (> median) burden groups.
- Multivariable Cox models with interaction terms (frailty × treatment) evaluated frailty's modification of ICD efficacy for mortality.
Main Results:
- Baseline frailty significantly modified ICD therapy's treatment effect (Pinteraction = 0.047).
- ICD therapy reduced all-cause mortality in patients with low frailty burden (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40-0.78).
- No significant mortality benefit from ICD therapy was observed in patients with high frailty burden (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.68-1.09).
Conclusions:
- Baseline frailty is a significant modifier of ICD therapy efficacy in HFrEF.
- A mortality benefit from ICDs was evident in HFrEF patients with low frailty burden.
- ICD therapy did not demonstrate a mortality benefit in HFrEF patients with high frailty burden.
Background:
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is recommended to reduce mortality risk in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Frailty is common among patients with HFrEF and is associated with increased mortality risk. Whether the therapeutic efficacy of ICD is consistent among frail and nonfrail patients with HFrEF remains unclear.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect modification of baseline frailty burden on ICD efficacy for primary prevention among participants of the SCD-HeFT (Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial).
Methods:
Participants in SCD-HeFT with HFrEF randomized to ICD vs placebo were included. Baseline frailty was estimated using the Rockwood Frailty Index (FI), and participants were stratified into high (FI > median) vs low (FI ≤ median) frailty burden groups. Multivariable Cox models with multiplicative interaction terms (frailty × treatment arm) were constructed to evaluate whether baseline frailty status modified the treatment effect of ICD for all-cause mortality.
Results:
The study included 1,676 participants (mean age: 59 ± 12 years, 23% women) with a median FI of 0.30 (IQR: 0.23-0.37) in the low frailty group and 0.54 (IQR: 0.47-0.60) in the high frailty group. In adjusted Cox models, baseline frailty status significantly modified the treatment effect of ICD therapy (Pinteraction = 0.047). In separate stratified analysis by frailty status, ICD therapy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality among participants with low frailty burden (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40-0.78) but not among those with high frailty burden (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.68-1.09).
Conclusions:
Baseline frailty modified the efficacy of ICD therapy with a significant mortality benefit observed among participants with HFrEF and a low frailty burden but not among those with a high frailty burden.
More Related Videos
05:53Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
Published on: July 24, 2013
04:00Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles
Published on: July 26, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care