Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Observer error in blood pressure measurement.

P D Neufeld, D L Johnson

    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal De L'Association Medicale Canadienne
    |September 15, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Susceptibility of Rice to Oebalus pugnax (F.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Feeding at Different Levels of Grain Maturity and Impacts on Insecticide Termination.

    Journal of economic entomology·2019
    Same author

    Experimental identification of diffusive coupling using 2D NMR.

    Physical review letters·2014
    Same author

    Application of genomic evaluation to dairy cattle in New Zealand.

    Journal of dairy science·2014
    Same author

    CCR2 antagonism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2014
    Same author

    Studies on sarkomycin.

    Antibiotics & chemotherapy (Northfield, Ill.)·2014
    Same author

    BIOMEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION FOR PHYSIOLOGY.

    A listing of research in the cardiovascular field·2014

    Observer error in blood pressure measurement is significant, with a tendency towards even-digit readings. This study highlights variations in accuracy among healthcare professionals, impacting patient care.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Diagnostics
    • Clinical Measurement Science

    Background:

    • Accurate blood pressure measurement is critical for patient diagnosis and management.
    • Observer variability in auscultatory blood pressure readings can lead to diagnostic and therapeutic errors.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To quantify observer error in blood pressure measurement using the auscultatory method.
    • To identify potential biases and variations in readings among different healthcare professional groups.

    Main Methods:

    • A microcomputer simulation displayed a mercury manometer and synchronized Korotkoff sounds.
    • 311 observers (physicians, nurses, students, others) participated across nine healthcare institutions.
    • Observer readings were recorded, and a histogram displayed inter-observer variability.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • A significant bias towards even-digit readings was observed.
    • Overall standard deviation for blood pressure readings was approximately 5-6 mm Hg.
    • Physicians showed a smaller standard deviation for systolic readings compared to nurses (3.5 vs. 5.9 mm Hg), while diastolic readings were similar.

    Conclusions:

    • Observer error in auscultatory blood pressure measurement is a notable concern.
    • Even-digit preference and inter-observer variability necessitate improved training and standardization.
    • While physicians showed slightly higher systolic accuracy, both groups exhibited similar diastolic variability.