Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
Multicentre medicoeconomic evaluation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for predicting coronary artery disease in
Louis-Marie Desroche1, Damien Mandry2, Gregory Ducrocq3
1Cardiology Department, CHU de la Réunion, allée des Topazes, 97490 Saint-Denis, France.
Insights
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) offers a non-invasive method to assess coronary artery disease in patients with reduced ejection fraction. The CAMAREC study validates CMR
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
- Non-invasive Cardiology
Background:
- Unexplained reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) often necessitates differentiation between ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- Coronary angiography, while definitive, is invasive and carries risks.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) presents a potential non-invasive alternative for etiological assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CMR in predicting significant coronary artery disease (CAD).
- To compare CMR's performance against coronary angiography (CAG), the gold standard.
- To assess CMR's utility in patients with unexplained reduced LVEF (≤ 45%).
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study (CAMAREC) involving 406 patients across 10 centers.
- Patients underwent CMR followed by CAG within a 2-week interval.
- Primary outcome: Sensitivity of CMR for detecting ischemic scar indicative of significant CAD (Felker's criteria); secondary outcomes include specificity, predictive values, concordance, and impact on revascularization decisions.
Main Results:
- The study is designed to rigorously assess the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of CMR.
- Analysis will determine the concordance between CMR and CAG in identifying affected myocardial territories.
- Ancillary studies will investigate cost-effectiveness and the role of T1-mapping.
Conclusions:
- The CAMAREC study protocol is established to rigorously evaluate CMR as a non-invasive diagnostic tool.
- Findings are expected to provide robust evidence for CMR's clinical utility in managing patients with reduced LVEF.
- Results may influence clinical practice by supporting CMR as a preferred alternative to invasive angiography.
Background:
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging may provide a non-invasive alternative to coronary angiography for differentiating between ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy in cases of unexplained reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
Aim:
The CAMAREC study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in predicting significant coronary artery disease in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, using coronary angiography as the gold standard for comparison.
Methods:
CAMAREC is a prospective cohort study of 406 patients in 10 centres with newly diagnosed, unexplained left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and coronary angiography will be conducted within a 2-week interval, starting with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; independent committees will review the results blindly. Primary outcome is sensitivity of detecting ischaemic scar on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for predicting significant coronary artery disease on coronary angiography according to Felker's criteria. Secondary outcomes include specificity and positive and negative predictive values (with 95% confidence intervals) of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for predicting significant coronary artery disease in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, kappa concordance coefficient between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and coronary angiography for diagnosing the affected myocardial territory, and the impact of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on revascularization decisions. Two ancillary studies will evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging first versus coronary angiography first, and the sensitivity of pre- and postcontrast T1-mapping for predicting significant coronary artery disease in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
Conclusion:
Our study protocol is designed to rigorously evaluate cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as a non-invasive alternative to coronary angiography in patients with unexplained reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The results will have significant implications for patient management, and may support growing evidence for the clinical utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
12:24Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Abnormalities in Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis by Magnetic Resonance Microscopy Imaging in the Mouse
Published on: June 20, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests