Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Subsidence analysis of a cementless short stem THA using EBRA-FCA - A seven-year prospective multicentre study
Hagen Mittelstaedt1, Conrad Anderl2, Reinhold Ortmaier2
1UKSH Campus Lübeck, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Sektion Orthopädie, Ratzeburger Allee, Lübeck, Germany.
Background:
Metaphyseal fixation of short stem THA allows for minimally invasive surgery, less bone removal, improved bone load transfer and reduced stress shielding. Short stems facilitate the anatomic restoration i.a. of leg length, femoroacetabular offset, and center of rotation. However, metaphyseal fixation might cause impaired primary and/or secondary stability resulting in an inherent tendency for early axial migration and aseptic loosening eventually. The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome and migration pattern of a calcar-guided short stem.
Methods:
In a prospective multicenter study, 213 patients (224 THAs) were enrolled. Patients were followed for up to 84 months postoperatively. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris Hip Score and the VAS for pain and satisfaction. Standardized and calibrated radiographs were screened i.a. for stress shielding and loosening. Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse - femoral component analysis (EBRA-FCA) was used to detect longitudinal subsidence.
Results:
At 7 year follow-up, n = 139/224 cases were available for analysis. All clinical parameters improved significantly (p < 0.001) and improvement persisted. There were no radiographic changes indicating stress shielding. EBRA-FCA revealed a mean subsidence of -1.44 mm followed by a stabilization. Weight >80 kg (p = 0.115), BMI <30 kg/m2 (p = 0.282), male gender (p = 0.246), and age <65 years (p = 0.304) seemed to be associated with a higher risk for migration. The cumulative revision rate was 2.23%. Revisions due to stem migration (0.89%) occurred early (mean time between index surgery and revision: 3.3 months).
Conclusions:
If at all, there appears to be a pronounced initial subsidence, which stabilizes thereafter. Stem migration was rarely a compelling reason for failure or revision. Demographics do not seem to have a significant effect on migration pattern. The absence of radioluce lines, resorption or hypertrophy of the proximal femora support the hypothesis of a reduced stress shielding for metaphyseal anchoring short stems.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
07:45The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022