Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

52
Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...
52
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

12.5K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
12.5K
Genome Annotation and Assembly03:36

Genome Annotation and Assembly

18.9K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
18.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metabolic modeling unveils potential probiotic roles of <i>Flavonifractor plautii</i> in reshaping the Western gut microbiota landscape.

ISME communications·2026
Same author

Acylcarnitines Are Associated with Metabolic Syndrome and Hypertension in Two Contrasted Obese Populations.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

Design-Build-Test-Learn-Guided Engineering of a Whole-Cell Pyruvate Biosensor Based on a Transcription Factor.

ACS synthetic biology·2026
Same author

Virtual Colon: spatiotemporal modeling of metabolic interactions in a computational colonic environment.

mSystems·2025
Same author

Author Correction: Metabolic modeling reveals a multi-level deregulation of host-microbiome metabolic networks in IBD.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

GEMsembler: consensus model assembly and structural comparison of genome-scale metabolic models across tools improve functional performance.

mSystems·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.2K

A structured evaluation of genome-scale constraint-based modeling tools for microbial consortia.

William T Scott1,2, Sara Benito-Vaquerizo1, Johannes Zimmermann3

  • 1Laboratory of Systems and Synthetic Biology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Plos Computational Biology
|August 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluates constraint-based reconstruction and analysis (COBRA) tools for simulating microbial communities. It assesses software quality and predictive power, offering recommendations for future development of genome-scale metabolic model (GEM) tools.

More Related Videos

Assessing the Viability of a Synthetic Bacterial Consortium on the In Vitro Gut Host-microbe Interface
10:24

Assessing the Viability of a Synthetic Bacterial Consortium on the In Vitro Gut Host-microbe Interface

Published on: July 4, 2018

11.7K
High-Throughput Metabolic Profiling for Model Refinements of Microalgae
11:07

High-Throughput Metabolic Profiling for Model Refinements of Microalgae

Published on: December 4, 2021

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.2K
Assessing the Viability of a Synthetic Bacterial Consortium on the In Vitro Gut Host-microbe Interface
10:24

Assessing the Viability of a Synthetic Bacterial Consortium on the In Vitro Gut Host-microbe Interface

Published on: July 4, 2018

11.7K
High-Throughput Metabolic Profiling for Model Refinements of Microalgae
11:07

High-Throughput Metabolic Profiling for Model Refinements of Microalgae

Published on: December 4, 2021

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Microbial Ecology
  • Systems Biology

Background:

  • Microbial consortia are crucial in healthcare, biotechnology, and environmental remediation.
  • Understanding microbial interactions is key to harnessing consortium potential.
  • Constraint-based reconstruction and analysis (COBRA) using genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) are state-of-the-art for simulating microbial communities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate existing COBRA-based tools for simulating microbial communities.
  • To assess software quality (FAIR principles) and predictive power of these tools.
  • To guide users in selecting appropriate tools and inform developers on future improvements.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative assessment of 24 COBRA tools based on FAIR features.
  • Quantitative testing of 14 tools against experimental data from three case studies (syngas fermentation, glucose/xylose fermentation, Petri dish co-culture).
  • Analysis of tool performance based on mathematical formulations and simulation scenarios (static, dynamic, spatiotemporal).

Main Results:

  • Significant variation in performance among evaluated COBRA tools.
  • Differences in tool performance correlate with their mathematical formulations and simulation approaches.
  • Qualitative assessment revealed varying levels of adherence to FAIR principles across tools.

Conclusions:

  • No single COBRA tool excels across all simulation types; tool selection depends on the specific application.
  • There is a need for improved COBRA tools with enhanced predictive capabilities and adherence to software quality standards.
  • Recommendations are provided for refining future GEM microbial modeling tools for better accuracy and usability.