Induction of a different immune response in non-titanized compared to titanized polypropylene meshes

It is well known that pelvic organ prolapse (POP) significantly reduces the quality of life of affected women and in many cases requires corrective surgery. Aim of the study was to compare the immune response against titanized versus non-titanized meshes, especially macrophage polarization and immune checkpoint association. For this, we analyzed 644 POP surgeries, which were performed between 2017 and 2022, in our department. Four of them needed revision surgery caused by erosion. We analyzed the influx of CD68 & CD163 positive macrophages and the expression of immune checkpoint molecules PD-L1 and PD1 in these 4 patients. We identified a large number of CD68 and CD163 positive macrophages and additionally a PD-L1 expression of these cells. Based on the in-vivo results, we isolated monocytes and co-cultivated monocytes with different mesh material covered with or without fibroblasts. We identified a significantly enhanced macrophage activation and PD-L1 expression in macrophages surrounding non-titanized polypropylene mesh material. Encapsulation of the material by fibroblasts was crucial for that. Specifically, CD68-positive macrophages are upregulated (p < 0.001), co-expressing PD-L1 (p < 0.001) in monocytes co-cultivated with non-titanized polypropylene meshes. Monocytes co-cultivated with titanized polypropylene meshes showed significantly lower expression of CD163 (p = 0.027) and PD-L1 (p = 0.022). In conclusion, our in vitro data suggest that the titanium coating leads to a decreased polarization of macrophages and to a decreased immune response compared to non-titanized meshes. This could be an indication for the increased incidence of erosion of the non-titanized meshes, which is a severe complication of this procedure and requires revision surgery. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Pelvic organ prolapse is a well-known problem for women and often requires corrective surgery. Polypropylene meshes are often used, which differ in their coating (titanized vs. non-titanized). A severe side effect of these surgeries is mesh erosion, due to onset of inflammation, which requires revision surgery. We examined all erosion cases (4 of 644 patients) with implanted nontitanium-coated meshes by immunohistochemistry and found upregulation of macrophage polarization (as markers CD68 and CD163) and increased expression of the immune checkpoint molecules PD-L1 and PD1. This suggests inflammatory processes and an enhanced immune response. In addition, we set up an in vitro experiment to investigate whether coating plays a role. Here, we demonstrated that the non-titanized meshes elicited a significantly higher immune response in comparison to titanized meshes, which could lead to the higher erosion rate of the non-titanized meshes. Our results highlight the benefit of titanized meshes, which should lead to a lower revision surgery rate and thus improved patient outcome.