Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Quantitative two-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging characterization of lower extremity venous
Yao-Kuang Huang1,2,3, Yin-Chen Hsu2,4,5, Yuan-Hsi Tseng1,2,3
1Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Chiayi Branch, Chiayi.
Background:
Lower extremity venous disease (LEVD) is a complex disorder, and determining the etiology of LEVD is paramount for treatment selection. Two-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (2D PC-MRI) can provide an objective measure of hemodynamic status and may help differentiate between different etiologies of LEVD. A total of 271 participants, including 256 symptomatic patients with venous lower extremity disease and 15 healthy volunteers, were collected in this cohort study.
Methods:
It is a single-center prospective observational study using 2D PC-MRI analysis to assess the hemodynamic characteristics of patients with LEVD among participants recruited between April 2017 and October 2021 at a tertiary hospital. The approval institutional review board number for this study were 201802137B0, 201901058B0, 202100938B0, and 202102344B0. Participants were classified as venous reflux (VR) and venous obstruction (VO) by standard ultrasonography. 2D PC-MRI by 1.5 T scanner revealed stroke volume (SV), forward flow volume (FFV), absolute stroke volume (ASV), mean flux (MF), velocity time integral (VTI), and mean velocity (MV) for each selected venous segments.
Results:
2D PC-MRI assessed 167 diseased legs from the 116 VR patients [mean age ± standard deviation (SD): 57.9±12.8 years; 39 males] and 113 diseased legs from the 95 VO patients (mean age ± SD: 66.4±12.8 years; 42 males). 2D PC-MRI analysis demonstrated discrimination ability to differentiate from VR to VO [SV, FFV, ASV, MF, VTI, and MV in the various venous segments, respectively, P≤0.001; area under the curve (AUC) =62-68.8%, P≤0.001 by Mann-Whitney U test]. The ratio data (morbid limb to normal limb) in the same individual with single-leg disease revealed differences between VR and VO (SV, FFV, ASV, and MF in the various venous segments, respectively; P<0.05; AUC =60.2-68.7%, P≤0.05 by Mann-Whitney U test). The most favorable differentiating variables of ratios were FFV in the great saphenous veins [AUC =68.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 59.8-77.6%] and ASV in the external iliac veins (AUC =67.4%, 95% CI: 58.7-76.2%).
Conclusions:
Quantitative 2D PC-MRI analysis is capable of differentiating VR from VO. It also provides an important diagnostic capability for preoperative evaluation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...
Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system...
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management

