Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Ethical Challenges in the Delivery of Family-Centered Nursing Care.

Journal of family nursing·2026

Same author

Risk-calibrated sharing of human brain data.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026

Same author

The next phase in Long COVID research: addressing the ethical challenges in trials of disease-modifying treatments.

EClinicalMedicine·2026

Same author

Inventing the future: A neuroscience research roadmap.

Neuron·2026

Same author

Ethical Considerations for Clinical Research in Persons with a Terminal Illness.

Aging and disease·2026

Same author

A latent activated olfactory stem cell state revealed by single-cell transcriptomic and epigenomic profiling.

Stem cell reports·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2025

The DREAM Implant: A Lightweight, Modular, and Cost-Effective Implant System for Chronic Electrophysiology in Head-Fixed and Freely Behaving Mice

The DREAM Implant: A Lightweight, Modular, and Cost-Effective Implant System for Chronic Electrophysiology in Head-Fixed and Freely Behaving Mice

Published on: July 26, 2024

Continuing trial responsibilities for implantable neural devices.

Saskia Hendriks¹, Nina Hsu², Andrea C Beckel-Mitchener³

¹Office of Neuroscience Communications and Engagement, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.

|August 15, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Participants in neural implant studies often require ongoing care, such as hardware replacements. Addressing these posttrial needs is crucial to prevent negative consequences for patients involved in clinical research.

Keywords:

brain continued access deep brain stimulation ethics implantable neurostimulators neural device neuroethics neurotechnology posttrial responsibilities research ethics

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Innovative Methodology for Implanting and Securing Neural Probes in the Rodent Spinal Cord

Author Spotlight: Innovative Methodology for Implanting and Securing Neural Probes in the Rodent Spinal Cord

Published on: July 12, 2024

An Implantable System For Chronic In Vivo Electromyography

An Implantable System For Chronic In Vivo Electromyography

Published on: April 21, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2025

The DREAM Implant: A Lightweight, Modular, and Cost-Effective Implant System for Chronic Electrophysiology in Head-Fixed and Freely Behaving Mice

The DREAM Implant: A Lightweight, Modular, and Cost-Effective Implant System for Chronic Electrophysiology in Head-Fixed and Freely Behaving Mice

Published on: July 26, 2024

Author Spotlight: Innovative Methodology for Implanting and Securing Neural Probes in the Rodent Spinal Cord

Author Spotlight: Innovative Methodology for Implanting and Securing Neural Probes in the Rodent Spinal Cord

Published on: July 12, 2024

An Implantable System For Chronic In Vivo Electromyography

An Implantable System For Chronic In Vivo Electromyography

Published on: April 21, 2020

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Biomedical Engineering
Clinical Research Ethics

Background:

Neural implant studies involve complex procedures with long-term implications for participants.
Posttrial care for participants in neural implant research is often overlooked.
Inadequate posttrial care can lead to significant adverse events and patient distress.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight the critical unmet posttrial care needs of neural implant study participants.
To emphasize the importance of comprehensive care planning beyond the active study period.
To advocate for improved support systems for individuals with neural implants.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on posttrial care in human subject research.
Analysis of case studies and anecdotal evidence from neural implant trials.
Identification of common posttrial care requirements, including device maintenance and monitoring.

Main Results:

Significant gaps exist in formal posttrial care plans for neural implant participants.
Hardware malfunctions and the need for replacements are frequent poststudy issues.
Lack of clear protocols for long-term follow-up poses risks to participant well-being.

Conclusions:

Healthcare professionals and research organizations must proactively address posttrial care needs.
Developing standardized protocols for long-term support is essential for ethical neural implant research.
Ensuring continuous care safeguards participants and upholds research integrity.