Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Priorities for peer support delivery among adults living with chronic kidney disease: a patient-oriented consensus
Meghan J Elliott1, Maoliosa Donald2, Janine Farragher2
1Departments of Medicine (Elliott, Love, Manns) and Community Health Sciences (Elliott, Donald, Fox), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Farragher), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Medicine Strategic Clinical Network (Verdin), Alberta Health Services; Patient and Community Engagement Research (PaCER) Program (Verdin), O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Patient Partner (Verdin, Sparkes), Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (Can-SOLVE CKD) Network, Vancouver, BC; Max Rady College of Medicine (Baragar), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry (Hemmelgarn), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. meghan.elliott@ahs.ca.
Background:
Peer support can address the informational and emotional needs of people living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and enable self-management. We aimed to identify preferences and priorities for content, format and processes of peer support delivery for patients with non-dialysis CKD and their loved ones.
Methods:
Using a patient-oriented research approach, we conducted a half-day, virtual consensus workshop with stakeholder participants from across Canada, including patients, caregivers, peer mentors and clinicians. Using personas (fictional characters), participants discussed and voted on preferences for delivery of peer support across format, content and process categories. We analyzed transcripts from small- and large-group discussions inductively using content analysis.
Results:
Twenty-one stakeholders, including 9 patients and 4 caregivers, participated in the workshop. In the voting exercise on format, participants prioritized peer mentor matching, programming for both patients and caregivers, and flexible scheduling. For content, participants prioritized informational and emotional support focus, and for process, they prioritized leveraging kidney care programs and alternative sources (e.g., social media) for promotion and referral. Analysis of workshop transcripts complemented prioritization results and emphasized tailoring of peer support delivery to accommodate the diversity of people living with CKD and their support needs. This concept was elaborated in 3 themes, namely alignment of program features with needs, inclusive peer support options and multiple access points.
Interpretation:
We identified preferences for peer support delivery for people living with CKD and underscore the importance of tailored, flexible programming in this context. Findings could be used to develop, adapt or study CKD-focused peer support interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Peritoneal Dialysis III: Nursing Management
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction

