The Patient-Determined Disease Steps scale is not interchangeable with the Expanded Disease Status Scale in mild to

Yi Chao Foong1,2,3,4, Daniel Merlo1,3, Melissa Gresle1,2,5

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

PubMed
Abstract

Insights

The Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale shows good reliability in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients but does not correlate well with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) over time. PDDS is not interchangeable with EDSS for assessing MS progression.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Research
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background:

  • The validity and reliability of the Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale are unknown in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with mild to moderate disability.
  • Assessing disease progression in MS is crucial for treatment decisions and requires reliable outcome measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the psychometric properties, including validity and test-retest reliability, of the PDDS scale in MS patients.
  • To evaluate the longitudinal performance of the PDDS scale and its correlation with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).

Main Methods:

  • Included relapsing-remitting MS patients with an EDSS score < 4.
  • Assessed validity and test-retest reliability of PDDS.
  • Analyzed longitudinal data using mixed-effect modeling and Cohen's kappa for confirmed disability progression (CDP).

Main Results:

  • PDDS showed a weak baseline correlation with EDSS (ρ=0.45) but stronger correlations with patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
  • PDDS demonstrated good to excellent test-retest reliability (CCC=0.73-0.89).
  • Longitudinally, PDDS correlated weakly with EDSS, age, and depression, with no concordance in CDP between PDDS and EDSS.

Conclusions:

  • PDDS correlates better with PROs than EDSS but shows limited correlation with other MS outcome measures.
  • PDDS and EDSS are not interchangeable for assessing MS disability and progression.
  • The PDDS scale may offer a valuable patient-centered perspective but should not replace established clinical measures like EDSS.

Related Concept Videos

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
2.8K
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation01:30

Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

Heart failure can be classified in various ways, with the most common classifications based on physical activity limitations, disease progression, severity, and treatment strategies.The Functional Classification of Heart Failure divides patients into four categories based on physical activity limitation due to symptom burden.Class I: Patients in this class have cardiac disease but no physical activity limitations. Ordinary activities like walking, climbing stairs, or routine tasks do not cause...
19
Classification of Illness01:17

Classification of Illness

The meaning of illness is individualized to each person who experiences an alteration in health. In contrast, disease is a medical term indicating a pathological change in the structure and function of the body or mind. It is a condition that has specific symptoms and boundaries.
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
7.6K