Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.8K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.8K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

50.0K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
50.0K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

59.5K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.5K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

3.4K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
3.4K
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.3K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Incidental findings in clinical imaging: should patient consent be obtained before disclosure?

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same author

Autonomy and the right not to know incidental findings arising during treatment response monitoring.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same author

Reframing the responsibility gap in medical artificial intelligence: insights from causal selection and authorship attribution.

Journal of medical ethics·2025
Same author

On subjective measures of decision quality.

Bioethics·2024
Same author

On the elusiveness of higher-order risk attitudes.

Journal of medical ethics·2023
Same author

On the relation between decision quality and autonomy in times of patient-centered care: a case study.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights
05:26

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.1K

Authenticity and the argument from testability: a bottom-up approach : Author.

Jasper Debrabander1

  • 1Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. jasper.debrabander@ugent.be.

Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy
|August 16, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study explores operationalizing authenticity using concordance measures, proposing a novel bottom-up approach. Findings reveal conceptual links and differences between concordance and authenticity, suggesting new responses to the argument from testability.

Keywords:
AuthenticityBottom-up approachConcordance

More Related Videos

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.1K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights
05:26

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.1K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.1K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Psychology
  • Epistemology

Background:

  • Jesper Ahlin Marceta's "argument from testability" posits practical impossibility in operationalizing procedural authenticity.
  • Existing responses primarily use a top-down approach, attempting to operationalize authenticity directly.
  • The bottom-up approach, utilizing existing assessment tools, remains largely untested.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate developing an account of authenticity using a bottom-up strategy based on concordance measures.
  • To explore the conceptual relationship between concordance and authenticity.
  • To differentiate judgments of concordance from judgments of authenticity and their justifications.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the relationship between concordance and authenticity.
  • Comparative analysis of judgments of concordance and authenticity, including scope and justification.
  • Exploration of the potential for developing a theory of concordance.

Main Results:

  • Conceptual similarities exist between concordance and authenticity, supporting the bottom-up approach.
  • Judgments of concordance and authenticity differ in scope and justification.
  • A theory of concordance is deemed potentially valuable but presents limitations for the bottom-up approach.

Conclusions:

  • The bottom-up approach offers a novel way to address the argument from testability.
  • Differentiating concordance and authenticity provides new avenues for responding to challenges in operationalizing authenticity.
  • Developing a theory of concordance is recommended, while acknowledging its limitations.