Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

3.4K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
3.4K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.8K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.8K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

221
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
221
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.3K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

2.0K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
2.0K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of Parameterization on Statistical Power and Effect Size Estimation in Latent Growth Modeling.

Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal·2021
Same author

New Approaches for Estimation of Effect Sizes and their Confidence Intervals for Treatment Effects from Randomized Controlled Trials.

The quantitative methods for psychology·2020
Same author

Time-Varying Effect Sizes for Quadratic Growth Models in Multilevel and Latent Growth Modeling.

Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal·2019
Same author

Mediation analysis with binary outcomes: Direct and indirect effects of pro-alcohol influences on alcohol use disorders.

Addictive behaviors·2019
Same author

Understanding the physical attractiveness literature: Qualitative reviews versus meta-analysis.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2017
Same author

Meta-analysis with standardized effect sizes from multilevel and latent growth models.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K

Regression-Equivalent Effect Sizes for Latent Growth Modeling and Associated Null Hypothesis Significance Tests.

Alan Feingold1

  • 1Oregon Social Learning Center.

Structural Equation Modeling : a Multidisciplinary Journal
|August 17, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces an intercept-focused approach for growth modeling, offering greater statistical power than traditional random slope methods. This method enhances the analysis of predictors affecting growth trajectories.

Keywords:
effect sizeslatent growth modelsmultilevel analysisregressionstatistical power

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Longitudinal Data Analysis

Background:

  • Traditional growth modeling with latent variables examines predictors of change using random slopes.
  • This approach can be complex and may not always offer optimal statistical power.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate an alternative intercept-focused approach for analyzing the effect of covariates on growth.
  • To show that this method yields equivalent effect sizes to classical regression analysis.
  • To compare the statistical power of the intercept-focused approach versus the random slopes approach.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing final status centering for parameterization in latent growth models.
  • Regressing random intercepts (or intercept factor scores) on an independent variable and a baseline covariate.
  • Applying an intercept-focused framework analogous to classical regression analysis.

Main Results:

  • The intercept-focused approach effectively estimates the same effect sizes (unstandardized regression coefficient, standardized regression coefficient, squared semi-partial correlation, Cohen's f² ) as classical regression.
  • Statistical power for detecting predictor effects on growth was higher with the random intercepts method compared to the conventional random slopes method.

Conclusions:

  • An intercept-focused approach provides a powerful and interpretable alternative for growth modeling.
  • This method simplifies the analysis of predictors of change and enhances statistical power.
  • Researchers can confidently apply this framework for more robust longitudinal data analysis.