Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Punishment01:27

Punishment

230
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
230
Operant Conditioning01:21

Operant Conditioning

1.7K
Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
1.7K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

119
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
119
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

274
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
274
Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

202
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
202
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

6.4K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shared neural transcriptomic patterns underlie the repeated evolution of mutualistic cleaning behaviour in Labridae wrasses.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Making friends in an asymmetric game: the establishment of male-female grooming exchanges in vervet monkeys.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Individual differences in motives for costly punishment.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

The interplay between satiation and temptation drives cleaner fish <i>Labroides dimidiatus</i> foraging behavior and service quality toward client reef fish.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2025
Same author

A fishy perspective on the social brain hypothesis.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

On the mirror test and the evolutionary origin of self-awareness in vertebrates.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same journal

Gaze in context: non-human eyes can be more salient under ecologically relevant conditions.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

The cultural ecology of social media.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

On the functional redundancy of alcohol tolerance in rice societies.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

Comparing predictions of anger in conflict situations: Recalibrational Theory versus Dark Triad traits.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

Adverse childhood experiences, age at menopause, and vasomotor symptoms among mid-life Latine adults in California.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

The evolution of identity signals for co-ordination in diverse societies.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2025

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

2.6K

Punishment: one tool, many uses.

Nichola J Raihani1, Redouan Bshary2

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK.

Evolutionary Human Sciences
|August 17, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Punishment helps cooperation but often sparks retaliation. This study reveals punishment serves a competitive function, aiming to equalize payoffs and status, not just deterring bad behavior.

Keywords:
Competitioncooperationfairnesspunishmentspite

More Related Videos

Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement
07:32

Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement

Published on: August 20, 2010

19.2K
Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling
05:21

Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling

Published on: February 16, 2024

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2025

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

2.6K
Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement
07:32

Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement

Published on: August 20, 2010

19.2K
Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling
05:21

Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling

Published on: February 16, 2024

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Psychology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Human cooperation with non-relatives is remarkable.
  • Punishment is traditionally viewed as a mechanism to enforce cooperation by deterring defectors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the primary function of punishment in human interactions.
  • To investigate whether punishment solely serves to deter defection or has other underlying motives.

Main Methods:

  • Synthesis of evidence from laboratory experiments.
  • Analysis of real-world settings involving punishment.

Main Results:

  • Evidence challenges the sole deterrent function of punishment.
  • Punishment frequently leads to retaliation.
  • Punishment decisions are often driven by competitive motives, such as equalizing or elevating relative payoffs and status.

Conclusions:

  • Punishment serves a competitive function beyond deterring defection.
  • Apparent spiteful behavior in punishment may aim to improve the punisher's relative standing.
  • Modifying institutions to mitigate relative payoff concerns could enhance punishment's effectiveness in restoring cooperation.