Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
Published on: October 6, 2023
Improving knowledge-based treatment planning for lung cancer radiotherapy with automatic multi-criteria optimized
Kristine Fjellanger1,2, Marte Hordnes2, Inger Marie Sandvik1
1Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Automated radiotherapy planning using knowledge-based planning (KBP) models trained with optimized plans (RP_MCO) significantly improved organ-at-risk sparing compared to models trained with manual plans (RP_CLIN). This enhanced approach was selected for clinical implementation, improving patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Knowledge-based planning (KBP) is an automated radiotherapy planning method using training plans to predict optimization objectives.
- KBP's effectiveness hinges on the quality of its training data.
- Integrating new automated planning systems into clinical workflows requires careful consideration of training data generation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of training data source on KBP model performance.
- To compare KBP models trained with manually created versus automatically generated multi-criteria optimized (MCO) plans.
- To assess the clinical utility and potential improvements in organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing offered by MCO-trained KBP models.
Main Methods:
- Two RapidPlan (KBP) models were created using 30 locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: one with manually created clinical plans (RP_CLIN) and one with fully automatic MCO plans (RP_MCO).
- Model performance was validated on 15 patients, comparing dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP).
- An oncologist conducted a blind comparison of clinical (CLIN), RP_CLIN, and RP_MCO plans.
Main Results:
- RP_MCO demonstrated superior OAR sparing for the heart and esophagus compared to RP_CLIN.
- RP_MCO resulted in a 0.9% average reduction in 2-year mortality risk and a 1.6% reduction in acute esophageal toxicity risk.
- An oncologist preferred RP_MCO plans for 8 patients and CLIN plans for 7, with no preference for RP_CLIN plans.
Conclusions:
- Training KBP models with automatically generated MCO plans (RP_MCO) significantly improves OAR sparing and NTCP compared to using manually created clinical plans (RP_CLIN).
- The RP_MCO approach was selected for clinical implementation due to its superior performance.
- Optimizing training library plans during KBP model creation is crucial for enhancing the quality of future treatment plans.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
08:25Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
Published on: April 11, 2018