Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. Part III. Virus Detection by RT-qPCR
Published on: January 16, 2016
Activity- and gene-based quantification of enteric viruses, F- specific RNA phage genogroups, pepper mild mottle
Akihiko Hata1, Yuno Meuchi1, Miaomiao Liu2
1Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Toyama Prefectural University, 5180 Kurokawa, Imizu, Toyama 939-0398, Japan.
Abstract:
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is widely applied for the monitoring of pathogenic viruses in water environments. To date, several pretreatments to selectively detect genes from infectious viruses via PCR have been developed. This study was aimed to characterize and validate methods for quantifying active viruses and indicators and to evaluate the proportion of their active fractions in surface water (n = 42). Active E. coli and F-specific RNA phage (FRNAPH) genogroups were quantified using culture assays. In addition to these microbes, norovirus genogroups I (GI) and II, Aichi virus 1, and pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) were quantified by (reverse transcription)-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) with and without cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum (CDDP) treatment to exclude genes in inactive viruses. CDDP-RT-qPCR showed concentrations and detection frequencies comparable to or higher than culture assays. Consequently, although CDDP-RT-qPCR can suggest the presence of an inactive virus, it can also overestimate the activity of the virus in the environment. Differences between culture and CDDP-RT-qPCR and between CDDP-RT-qPCR and RT-qPCR varied among the viruses. CDDP-RT-qPCR showed a concentration comparable to the culture assay (within 1 log10 difference) in 93 % of positive samples for GI-FRNAPH but in <63 % of positive samples for GII- and GIII-FRNAPHs. GII-NoV was detected from 5 and 30 out of 42 samples via CDDP-RT-qPCR and RT-qPCR, respectively, and was suggested as inactivated by 2.0 log10 or higher in most of the samples. By contrast, concentrations of PMMoV determined by these two assays were not notably different. It is suggested that the operational conditions of wastewater treatment plants around the sites, rather than environmental stresses, affected the microbial inactivation. To better understand the infectivity of viruses in the environment, it is important to investigate them using sensitive detection methods at various sites, including the source of contamination.
More Related Videos
11:09EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. II. Total Culturable Virus Assay
Published on: September 11, 2016
10:48EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. I. Collection of Virus Samples
Published on: March 28, 2015