Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial to determine the efficacy of an intensive seated postural

Victor Santamaria1, Xupeng Ai2, Karen Chin3,4

  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Sciences: Physical Therapy Division, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.

BMJ Open
|August 17, 2023
PubMed

Insights

This study tests a new robotic trainer for children with cerebral palsy (CP) to improve sitting balance and reaching. The robotic intervention showed promise in enhancing functional abilities for children with CP.

Area of Science:

  • Rehabilitation Engineering
  • Motor Learning
  • Pediatric Physical Therapy

Background:

  • Children with cerebral palsy (CP) classified under Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels III-IV often experience significant challenges with sitting and reaching control, impacting their functional performance.
  • Existing interventions for improving sitting-related activities in this population are limited.
  • A novel motor learning-based intervention utilizing a robotic Trunk-Support-Trainer (TruST) with individualized force field technology for sitting balance support has been developed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of a motor learning-based intervention delivered via a robotic TruST compared to a static trunk support system.
  • To assess the impact of the TruST intervention on sitting balance, reaching control, and overall functional performance in children with CP (GMFCS III-IV).

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 82 participants with CP (GMFCS III-IV), aged 6-17 years.
  • Interventions included 2 hours/session, 3 times/week for 4 weeks, with progressive task difficulty and support reduction.
  • Outcomes measured at baseline, midpoint, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up, including modified functional reach test, kinematic sitting workspace, Box and Block test, and various functional/participation measures.

Main Results:

  • Primary outcomes included modified functional reach test, kinematic sitting workspace evaluation, and the Box and Block test.
  • Secondary outcomes encompassed The Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control, Seated Postural & Reaching Control test, Gross Motor Function Measure-Item Set, Canadian Occupational Performance Outcome, The Participation and Environment Measure and Youth, and postural and reaching kinematics.
  • Data collection occurred at baseline, training midpoint, 1-week post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up.

Conclusions:

  • The study aims to determine if the robotic TruST intervention offers superior benefits compared to traditional static support for children with CP.
  • Findings will inform the development of more effective rehabilitation strategies for improving functional abilities in children with severe motor impairments.
  • This research contributes to the field of assistive technology and motor rehabilitation for pediatric populations.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos