Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

A Rehabilitation Program of Exoskeleton-assisted Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Training with Non-immersive Virtual Reality for Stroke Patients
Published on: May 16, 2025
Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial to determine the efficacy of an intensive seated postural
Victor Santamaria1, Xupeng Ai2, Karen Chin3,4
1Department of Rehabilitation Sciences: Physical Therapy Division, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Insights
This study tests a new robotic trainer for children with cerebral palsy (CP) to improve sitting balance and reaching. The robotic intervention showed promise in enhancing functional abilities for children with CP.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation Engineering
- Motor Learning
- Pediatric Physical Therapy
Background:
- Children with cerebral palsy (CP) classified under Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels III-IV often experience significant challenges with sitting and reaching control, impacting their functional performance.
- Existing interventions for improving sitting-related activities in this population are limited.
- A novel motor learning-based intervention utilizing a robotic Trunk-Support-Trainer (TruST) with individualized force field technology for sitting balance support has been developed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of a motor learning-based intervention delivered via a robotic TruST compared to a static trunk support system.
- To assess the impact of the TruST intervention on sitting balance, reaching control, and overall functional performance in children with CP (GMFCS III-IV).
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 82 participants with CP (GMFCS III-IV), aged 6-17 years.
- Interventions included 2 hours/session, 3 times/week for 4 weeks, with progressive task difficulty and support reduction.
- Outcomes measured at baseline, midpoint, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up, including modified functional reach test, kinematic sitting workspace, Box and Block test, and various functional/participation measures.
Main Results:
- Primary outcomes included modified functional reach test, kinematic sitting workspace evaluation, and the Box and Block test.
- Secondary outcomes encompassed The Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control, Seated Postural & Reaching Control test, Gross Motor Function Measure-Item Set, Canadian Occupational Performance Outcome, The Participation and Environment Measure and Youth, and postural and reaching kinematics.
- Data collection occurred at baseline, training midpoint, 1-week post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up.
Conclusions:
- The study aims to determine if the robotic TruST intervention offers superior benefits compared to traditional static support for children with CP.
- Findings will inform the development of more effective rehabilitation strategies for improving functional abilities in children with severe motor impairments.
- This research contributes to the field of assistive technology and motor rehabilitation for pediatric populations.
Introduction:
Children with cerebral palsy (CP) classified as gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) levels III-IV demonstrate impaired sitting and reaching control abilities that hamper their overall functional performance. Yet, efficacious interventions for improving sitting-related activities are scarce. We recently designed a motor learning-based intervention delivered with a robotic Trunk-Support-Trainer (TruST-intervention), in which we apply force field technology to individualise sitting balance support. We propose a randomised controlled trial to test the efficacy of the motor intervention delivered with robotic TruST compared with a static trunk support system.
Methods And Analysis:
We will recruit 82 participants with CP, GMFCS III-IV, and aged 6-17 years. Randomisation using concealed allocation to either the TruST-support or static trunk-support intervention will be conducted using opaque-sealed envelopes prepared by someone unrelated to the study. We will apply an intention-to-treat protocol. The interventions will consist of 2 hours/sessions, 3/week, for 4 weeks. Participants will start both interventions with pelvic strapping. In the TruST-intervention, postural task progression will be implemented by a progressive increase of the force field boundaries and then by removing the pelvic straps. In the static trunk support-intervention, we will progressively lower the trunk support and remove pelvic strapping. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, training midpoint, 1-week postintervention, and 3-month follow-up. Primary outcomes will include the modified functional reach test, a kinematic evaluation of sitting workspace, and the Box and Block test. Secondary outcomes will include The Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control test, Seated Postural & Reaching Control test, Gross Motor Function Measure-Item Set, Canadian Occupational Performance Outcome, The Participation and Environment Measure and Youth, and postural and reaching kinematics.
Ethics And Dissemination:
The study was approved by the Columbia University Institutional Review Board (AAAS7804). This study is funded by the National Institutes of Health (1R01HD101903-01) and is registered at clinicaltrials.gov.
Trial Registration Number:
NCT04897347; clinicaltrials.gov.
More Related Videos
08:40Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
14:56The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb
Published on: September 23, 2018