Digital tools for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection

Conduct a scoping review on the development and use of digital tools for post-discharge surgical site infection surveillance.

Scoping review.

Science Direct, PubMed, Embase, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched from 2013 to May 2022. Six intellectual property registries were reviewed from 2013 to 2022.

The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute model, and included intellectual property records (applications, prototypes and software) and scientific articles published in any language on the development and/or testing of digital tools for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection among surgical patients aged 18 and over.

One intellectual property record and 13 scientific articles were identified, covering 10 digital tools. The intellectual property record was developed and registered by a China educational institution in 2018. The majority of manuscripts were prospective cohort studies and randomized clinical trials, published between 2016 and 2022, and more than half were conducted in the United States. The population included adult patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic, vascular, abdominal, arthroplasty and caesarean surgery. The main functionalities of the digital tools were the previously prepared questionnaire, the attachment of a wound image, the integrated Web system and the evaluation of data by the health team, with post-discharge surgical site infection surveillance time between 14 and 30 days after surgery.

Digital tools show promise for the surveillance of surgical site infection, collaborating with the early detection of wound infection.

Mobile technology was favourable for detecting surgical site infections, reducing unnecessary visits to the health service, and increasing patient satisfaction.

Technological advances in the health area open new perspectives for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN?: There is underreporting of surgical site infections due to difficulties related to traditional methods of post-discharge surveillance. The use of digital tools within surgical site infection surveillance is increasing. Benefits of using digital tools within surgical site infection surveillance have been reported. WHAT HAS THIS STUDY ADDED TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?: This scoping review is one of the first to analyse the development and use of digital tools for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection in different countries. The main functionalities of digital tools are: structured questionnaires; attachment of wound images; integrated web systems; and evaluation of data by professionals. The use of mobile technology is favourable for detecting surgical site infections with a reduction in costs from face-to-face consultations and increased patient satisfaction. WHERE AND ON WHOM WILL THE RESEARCH HAVE AN IMPACT?: Healthcare providers can successfully use digital tools for surgical site infection post-discharge surveillance. Remote monitoring can reduce unnecessary patient visits to healthcare facilities. Policy makers can study how to implement digital platforms for remote patient monitoring.

PRISMA statement for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

No patient or public contribution.

The study protocol was registered in the OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BA8D6).