Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2025

PARbars: Cheap, Easy to Build Ceptometers for Continuous Measurement of Light Interception in Plant Canopies
Published on: May 9, 2019
Estimation of photosynthetic dynamics in forests from daily measured fluorescence and PRI data with adjustment for
Daniel Kováč1, Jan Novotný1, Ladislav Šigut1
1Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Abstract:
We conducted year-long measurements of the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and solar-induced fluorescence in the O2A oxygen band (SIFA) at a Norway spruce forest and a European beech forest to study relationships of these remote sensing variables to photosynthesis by trees in grown forest stands. Measured PRI and SIFA values were linked to changes in forest gross primary productivity (GPP) and light-use efficiency (LUE). Changes in the shadow fraction (αS) within tree crowns influenced PRI and fluorescence signals. In the spruce forest, the quantum yield of SIFA (FYSIFA) decreased around midday together with photosynthesis and GPP. Such decreases in FYSIFA were accompanied by an increase in the αS. In the beech forest, we detected an increase in FYSIFA together with a decrease in αS in the afternoon hours. The overall sensitivity of PRI to LUE was variable according to the season, presumably influenced by complex changes in photosynthetic pigments. PRI and FYSIFA showed weak correlations with canopy LUE; however, when considered together, the correlation was strengthened (R2 was 0.63 and 0.34 in spruce and beech forest, respectively). Our model predicting LUE dynamics includes a diurnal minimum of PRI and canopy αS to make allowances for seasonal changes in photosynthetic pigments and for diurnal variability of the shadow fraction in forests. The incorporation of these correcting factors allowed us to estimate LUE at R2 = 0.68 (spruce) and 0.53 (beech). The modeling equations appeared sensitive to the absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR), but less sensitive to the GPP of these forests. Substituting pigments correction with introducing differential PRI (ΔPRI) into the model did not significantly improve the LUE estimation across the season. Our results show that the joint use of PRI and fluorescence improves LUE and GPP estimation accuracy in both daily and seasonal observations.
More Related Videos
10:20Evaluation of Photosynthetic Behaviors by Simultaneous Measurements of Leaf Reflectance and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Analyses
Published on: August 9, 2019
10:08High-Throughput Analysis of Non-Photochemical Quenching in Crops Using Pulse Amplitude Modulated Chlorophyll Fluorometry
Published on: July 6, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Biological Clocks and Seasonal Responses
Light Acquisition
Flame Photometry: Overview