Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2025

Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
Towards Prediction of Blood Flow in Coiled Aneurysms Before Treatment: A Porous Media Approach
Julia Romero Bhathal1, Laurel Marsh2, Michael R Levitt3
1University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, 3SR, Grenoble, France.
Abstract:
Modeling blood flow in aneurysms treated with coils could be used to understand the complete embolization of the aneurysm, through thrombus formation that fills the entire sac. Modeling of the endovascular coil mass as a porous medium is a technique that allows for study of aneurysm hemodynamics, efficiently for patient-specific treatment outcome predictions. Models in the literature use mean porosity of coils in the aneurysmal volume, proving inadequate for outcome prediction. However, models that consider heterogeneous porosity distribution have shown more accurate hemodynamics. We recently published the porous crown model, considering the heterogeneous coil mass distribution, validated on two patients. This study aims (i) to validate the porous crown model for a larger cohort (eight patients), and (ii) to propose a porous medium model translatable to clinical practice in treatment planning. We analyzed the porosity distribution of the endovascular coils deployed inside the cerebral aneurysm phantoms of eight patients using 3D x-ray synchrotron images. The permeability and inertial factor of the porous crown model are calculated using previously published methodology. We propose a new "bilinear" porous model, that uses the same hypothesis, but the permeability and inertial factor can be defined from just basic information available in the neuro-suite, i.e., the aneurysmal sac volume and the coil volume fraction targeted by the neurosurgeon. These two models are compared to the coil-resolved simulations, considered as the gold standard. The results show that both the porous crown model and the bilinear model produce similarly accurate hemodynamics in the aneurysm. The error in the standard (mean porosity) porous model is 66%, whereas the error of the bilinear model is 26%, compared to the coil-resolved. The bilinear model is promising as a means of treatment outcome prediction at time of intervention.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Steady, Laminar Flow in Circular Tubes
Development of Blood Vessels
The initial formation of this system is facilitated by the small amount of yolk present in the ovum and yolk sac. Blood vessels originate from...
Blood Flow

